Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Worldatwork Exam T4 Topic 5 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Worldatwork's T4 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 5
[All T4 Questions]

Which of the following base pay methods best supports behaviours needed by high-involvement firms?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Wilda
1 months ago
Pay for knowledge gets my vote. It's like a knowledge buffet - the more you know, the more you get paid. Yum!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
1 months ago
Market pricing? More like 'market chaos'! With the way the economy is these days, that's a recipe for disaster in a high-involvement firm.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
2 days ago
Definitely, job evaluation can help ensure fair compensation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
6 days ago
I agree, pay for knowledge seems like a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
11 days ago
Market pricing can lead to instability in high-involvement firms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
16 days ago
D) broad banding
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
17 days ago
C) job evaluation
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
24 days ago
B) pay for knowledge
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
26 days ago
A) market pricing
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julie
2 months ago
But pay for knowledge incentivizes employees to continuously learn and improve their skills, which is crucial for high-involvement firms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe broad banding is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
2 months ago
I'm going with job evaluation. It's a more structured approach and ensures fairness in compensation, which is important in a high-involvement environment.
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
25 days ago
Market pricing is important to stay competitive, but it may not always align with the specific needs of high-involvement firms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janae
1 months ago
Broad banding can be effective too, as it allows for more flexibility in pay ranges and encourages cross-functional collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 months ago
I think pay for knowledge is also important in high-involvement firms, as it rewards employees for acquiring and applying new skills.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
1 months ago
I agree, job evaluation provides a clear framework for determining pay based on skills and responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julie
2 months ago
I think pay for knowledge is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
Broad banding sounds like a good option. It allows for more flexibility and can adapt to the changing needs of the business.
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
28 days ago
Market pricing may not be as effective in this case, since it's more rigid compared to broad banding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
1 months ago
I agree, it provides the flexibility needed to support the behaviors of those firms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
2 months ago
Broad banding is definitely a great option for high-involvement firms.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
2 months ago
I think pay for knowledge is the way to go. It encourages continuous learning and skill development, which is crucial for high-involvement firms.
upvoted 0 times
Van
1 months ago
Job evaluation could work, but I think pay for knowledge is more aligned with the needs of high-involvement firms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loreta
1 months ago
Market pricing might be good too, as it ensures competitiveness in the market for talent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 months ago
I think broad banding could also be effective in high-involvement firms, as it allows for more flexibility in pay ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
2 months ago
I agree, pay for knowledge really does support continuous learning and skill development.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel