BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Worldatwork Exam C2 Topic 2 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Worldatwork's C2 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 2
[All C2 Questions]

When would the paired-comparison approach be preferred over the simple ranking approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Vince at Sep 16, 2024, 09:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Ariel
1 months ago
But what about when there is a need for accurate market data? Wouldn't simple ranking be better in that case?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
2 months ago
I agree with Mary. It allows for a more systematic comparison.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
2 months ago
Hold up, what if I just compare the jobs to a giant hamster wheel? That's a simple ranking approach, right? Hey, don't judge me, I'm just thinking outside the box here!
upvoted 0 times
Annabelle
18 hours ago
C) When the cost of simple ranking becomes prohibitive
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
2 days ago
B) When there is a need for accurate market data
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
3 days ago
A) When evaluating a larger number of jobs
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roosevelt
2 months ago
I'm feeling a bit sleepy, but I think the correct answer is C. Who wants to spend a fortune on simple ranking, am I right? Paired-comparison is the way to go, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
1 months ago
C) When the cost of simple ranking becomes prohibitive
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
1 months ago
B) When there is a need for accurate market data
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
1 months ago
A) When evaluating a larger number of jobs
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mary
2 months ago
I think the paired-comparison approach would be preferred when evaluating a larger number of jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Accurate market data is crucial, but if the cost of simple ranking is too high, paired-comparison might be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peter
2 months ago
D seems like the obvious choice here. If you don't have enough information on the job content, the paired-comparison method can help fill in the gaps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
2 months ago
I'd go with option A. Comparing a larger number of jobs just makes more sense with the paired-comparison approach.
upvoted 0 times
Gerry
28 days ago
Yeah, it just makes sense to use the paired-comparison approach for that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
30 days ago
It definitely simplifies the process when dealing with a large number of jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 months ago
I agree, the paired-comparison approach would be more efficient in that case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice for evaluating a larger number of jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel