Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VMware Exam 5V0-22.23 Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 5V0-22.23 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 1
[All 5V0-22.23 Questions]

An administrator has deployed a new vSAN OSA cluster that contains eight hosts and needs to configure a storage policy for the currently deployed database virtual machines. The requirements state that if two hosts in the vSAN OSA cluster fail, all virtual machines are unaffected.

Which RAID configuration must the administrator use in this storage policy to achieve the best performance for the database virtual machines?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Rory at Oct 18, 2024, 06:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 5V0-22.23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Michell
2 months ago
Hold on, is RAID-5 really that slow these days? I remember when it used to be a performance bottleneck, but with modern hardware, it might not be too bad. Hmm, tough call.
upvoted 0 times
Mona
12 days ago
C) RAID-6
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
18 days ago
B) RAID-5
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
1 months ago
A) RA1D-1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
I'm with Rickie on this one. RAID-6 is the clear winner. It's like having a spare tire for your spare tire, just in case. Gotta love that redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
2 months ago
RAID-0? Really? That's just asking for trouble with this requirement. You'd lose all your data if two hosts fail. Definitely not the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about RAID-6. Wouldn't RAID-5 be a better choice? It still provides redundancy and might offer better performance for the database workload.
upvoted 0 times
Delisa
21 days ago
Let's go with RAID-5 for the database virtual machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
25 days ago
RAID-6 offers more redundancy, but RAID-5 could be better for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
27 days ago
Let's go with RAID-5 for the storage policy to ensure performance and some level of protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
28 days ago
I agree, RAID-5 could provide the performance needed while still offering some level of redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
28 days ago
RAID-5 does provide redundancy and might be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 months ago
RAID-6 offers more redundancy, but RAID-5 might be better for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 months ago
I think RAID-5 would be a better choice for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
1 months ago
I think RAID-5 would be a better choice for performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rickie
2 months ago
RAID-6 is the way to go here. It provides the redundancy required to withstand the loss of two hosts, while still maintaining performance for the database VMs.
upvoted 0 times
Tuyet
2 months ago
Great choice, RAID-6 will offer both performance and protection for the virtual machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
2 months ago
RAID-6 it is then, to ensure the database VMs remain unaffected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
2 months ago
I agree, RAID-6 provides the necessary redundancy for two host failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
2 months ago
I think RAID-6 is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacob
3 months ago
I agree with Alberto, RAID-6 provides both performance and redundancy for the database virtual machines.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
3 months ago
I think the best RAID configuration for this scenario would be RAID-6.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel