Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 2V0-21.23 Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-21.23 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 1
[All 2V0-21.23 Questions]

A vSphere cluster has the following vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) group configuration:

* Virtual machine (VM) group named DB

* Host groups named PROD11 and PROD55

The administrator wants to force the VMs in the DB group to run on the hosts in the PROD11 group. However, if all the hosts in PROD55.

Which VM/Host rule must the administrator create to ensure that these requirements are met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shaun
22 days ago
This question is giving me flashbacks to my vSphere exam. Glad I don't have to take that test again! Anyway, the answer is totally D - a required rule is the only way to ensure those VMs end up on the PROD11 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
24 days ago
Okay, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna say option D, but I'm not 100% sure. Maybe I should've paid more attention in class when we covered DRS rules...
upvoted 0 times
Sherita
4 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It's better to be safe and make sure the VMs run on the specified hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
13 days ago
I think option D makes sense, it's a required rule between the DB group and the PROD11 group.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashandra
1 months ago
Hah, the question says the admin wants to force the VMs to run on the PROD11 hosts. That means a preferential rule ain't gonna cut it. Gotta be a required rule, so D is the answer.
upvoted 0 times
Elly
11 days ago
Definitely, a required rule is needed to ensure the VMs run on the PROD11 hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
18 days ago
Yeah, I agree. A preferential rule wouldn't force the VMs to run on specific hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
21 days ago
I think it's D, a required rule between the DB group and the PROD11 group.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivette
2 months ago
I'm gonna go with option A. A preferential rule between the DB group and PROD11 group sounds like it would do the trick. It's not as strict as a required rule, but should still get the job done.
upvoted 0 times
Lorean
11 days ago
Yeah, option A makes sense. It strikes a good balance between flexibility and ensuring the VMs run on the specified hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the most appropriate rule to create in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It allows for some flexibility while still ensuring the VMs run on the desired hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlyn
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be C) A preferential rule between the DB group and the PROD55 group. It could also work, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
2 months ago
I agree with Simona. The administrator wants to force the VMs in the DB group to run on the hosts in the PROD11 group, so a required rule makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
2 months ago
Definitely option D. A required rule between the DB group and the PROD11 group is the way to go. Preferential rules are for suggestions, not hard requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Garry
10 days ago
Exactly, we need a hard requirement in this case to meet the administrator's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
11 days ago
That makes sense, preferential rules are more like recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
12 days ago
Yes, a required rule ensures that the VMs in the DB group will run on the hosts in the PROD11 group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
1 months ago
I agree, option D is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Simona
2 months ago
I think the answer is D) A required rule between the DB group and the PROD11 group.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel