New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware 2V0-21.23 Exam - Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-21.23 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 1
[All 2V0-21.23 Questions]

A vSphere cluster has the following vSphere Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) group configuration:

* Virtual machine (VM) group named DB

* Host groups named PROD11 and PROD55

The administrator wants to force the VMs in the DB group to run on the hosts in the PROD11 group. However, if all the hosts in PROD55.

Which VM/Host rule must the administrator create to ensure that these requirements are met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Catarina
4 months ago
Not sure about that, what if PROD55 has more resources?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
4 months ago
Surprised this is even a question, it's pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
4 months ago
No way, it has to be required for PROD11!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
4 months ago
I think a preferential rule would work too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
4 months ago
Definitely need a required rule for DB and PROD11.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between required and preferential rules. I think I might lean towards option D, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
5 months ago
If PROD55 is down, the VMs should still run on PROD11, so I feel like a required rule is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to prioritize VMs on specific hosts. I think a preferential rule might not enforce it strictly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
5 months ago
I think we need a required rule for the DB group and PROD11, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good strategy here. Definitely want to leverage the built-in Salesforce features like picklists and validation rules. And the Apex option could be useful for more complex validations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the sequence of UPDATE statements and the potential for lock contention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know Google has a lot of cloud services, but I'm not totally familiar with the differences between them. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel