Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

VMware Exam 2V0-13.24 Topic 3 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for VMware's 2V0-13.24 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 3
[All 2V0-13.24 Questions]

An architect is working on higher-scale NSX Grouping and security design requirements for Management and VI Workload Domains in VMware Cloud Foundation. Which NSX Manager appliance size will be considered for use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, NSX Manager appliances manage networking and security (e.g., grouping, policies, firewalls) for Management and VI Workload Domains. The appliance size---Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large---determines its capacity to handle scale, such as the number of hosts, VMs, and security objects. The phrase ''higher scale'' implies a larger-than-minimum deployment. Let's evaluate:

NSX Manager Appliance Sizes (VCF 5.2 with NSX-T 3.2):

Small: 4 vCPUs, 16 GB RAM, 300 GB disk. Supports up to 16 hosts, basic deployments (e.g., lab environments).

Medium: 6 vCPUs, 24 GB RAM, 300 GB disk. Supports up to 64 hosts, suitable for small to medium production environments.

Large: 12 vCPUs, 48 GB RAM, 300 GB disk. Supports up to 512 hosts, 10,000 VMs, and complex security policies---standard for production VCF.

Extra Large: 24 vCPUs, 64 GB RAM, 300 GB disk. Supports over 512 hosts, massive scale (e.g., service providers, multi-VCF instances).

VCF Context:

Management Domain: Minimum 4 hosts, often 6-7 for HA, with NSX for overlay networking.

VI Workload Domains: Variable host counts, but ''higher scale'' suggests multiple domains or significant workload growth.

Security Design: Grouping and policies (e.g., distributed firewall rules, tags) increase NSX Manager load, especially at scale.

Evaluation:

Small: Insufficient for production VCF, limited to 16 hosts. Unsuitable for a Management Domain (4-7 hosts) plus VI Workload Domains.

Medium: Adequate for small VCF deployments (up to 64 hosts), but ''higher scale'' implies more hosts or complex security, exceeding its capacity.

Large: The default and recommended size for VCF 5.2 production environments. It supports up to 512 hosts, thousands of VMs, and extensive security policies, fitting a Management Domain and multiple VI Workload Domains with ''higher scale'' needs.

Extra Large: Overkill unless managing hundreds of hosts or multiple VCF instances, which isn't indicated here.

Conclusion:

The Large NSX Manager appliance size (Option B) is appropriate for a higher-scale NSX design in VCF 5.2. It balances capacity and performance for Management and VI Workload Domains with advanced security requirements, aligning with VMware's standard recommendation.


VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: NSX Manager Sizing)

NSX-T 3.2 Installation Guide (integrated in VCF 5.2): Appliance Size Specifications

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Security Design)

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mollie
7 hours ago
Extra Large? More like Extra Beefy! I bet the architects could grill a steak on that thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
1 days ago
Guys, let's not forget that the Small option is also on the table. I mean, who needs all that horsepower anyway? We're just running a few VMs, not launching a spaceship.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 days ago
C'mon, people. This is a no-brainer. The Medium option is the perfect balance of power and cost. Why complicate things?
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
3 days ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. The Large option might be a better fit for the higher-scale requirements. We don't want to overspend on resources we don't need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
13 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think the Large size could also be sufficient for the Management and VI Workload Domains.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
14 days ago
I agree with Herschel. The Extra Large size will provide the necessary resources for higher-scale NSX Grouping and security design requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
23 days ago
I think we should go with the Extra Large option. Bigger is always better, right?
upvoted 0 times
Veronica
8 days ago
That sounds like a good plan. Let's go with the Large option for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
9 days ago
Maybe we should consider the Large option for now and scale up if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
10 days ago
But do we really need that much for our current workload?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
13 days ago
I agree, Extra Large would provide more capacity and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Herschel
29 days ago
I think the architect should consider using the Extra Large NSX Manager appliance size.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel