I don't know about you guys, but I'm feeling a little bit like a detective trying to solve this mystery. Maybe we should just ask the instructor to give us a hint, or at least a cup of coffee to keep us going!
Hmm, I'm leaning towards A. Flagging the items for further review during the CPAT makes sense to me. After all, we don't want any surprises in the final results!
Wow, this is a tough one! I'm going to have to go with C. OCR'ing those items during the Controlled Prediction Accuracy Test seems like the most logical approach.
I'm not sure about this one. It seems like option B might be the way to go, since including the items in the training set could help the algorithm learn to handle them better.
I think the answer is D. Items without text content should be separated for manual review, as they can't be easily analyzed by the predictive coding algorithm.
Mozelle
2 months agoIlene
23 days agoSharita
26 days agoLynda
1 months agoGladis
2 months agoShaniqua
2 months agoDesirae
2 months agoLyndia
1 months agoJessenia
2 months agoJodi
2 months agoCristy
3 months agoMagdalene
3 months agoOneida
3 months agoMerissa
3 months agoAudry
3 months agoAugustine
2 months agoTrinidad
3 months agoMonte
3 months agoTashia
3 months ago