Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Veritas Exam VCS-278 Topic 8 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Veritas's VCS-278 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 8
[All VCS-278 Questions]

What are the minimal policy directive(s) to ensure all components of a Windows server system are protected when performing a backup?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Fausto
9 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward solution. Increase the max concurrent jobs on the storage server and let those backups and replications play nice together.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
7 months ago
I've had a similar issue before, and increasing the max concurrent jobs really made a difference in the overall performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
7 months ago
I agree, that should help with the queue of replication jobs waiting for the backups to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
7 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward solution. Increase the max concurrent jobs on the storage server and let those backups and replications play nice together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Princess
7 months ago
I think increasing the maximum concurrent jobs in the storage server properties is the way to go. It will definitely help with the queue for replication jobs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
7 months ago
I agree, that should help prioritize the replication jobs without waiting for the backups to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
8 months ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward solution. Increase the max concurrent jobs on the storage server and let those backups and replications play nice together.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fairy
9 months ago
I believe increasing the 'Maximum I/O Streams' for the disk pool could also help in ensuring replications can occur smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
9 months ago
Haha, gotta love those backup bottlenecks! I'd say C is the way to go - crank up those disk storage unit jobs and let those replications fly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe increasing the priority for secondary operations in the SLP would be the way to go? That's my guess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
9 months ago
I'd go with D. Increasing the max I/O streams for the disk pool seems like the best way to handle this bottleneck.
upvoted 0 times
Kris
8 months ago
Agreed, that should help with the bottleneck.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
8 months ago
I think increasing the max I/O streams for the disk pool is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nidia
9 months ago
I agree with Dierdre, increasing the 'Maximum concurrent jobs' would allow replications to occur without waiting for backups to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
9 months ago
I think the administrator should increase the 'Maximum concurrent jobs' in the storage server properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
9 months ago
Option B looks good to me. Increasing the max concurrent jobs on the storage server should let the replication jobs run without waiting for the backups.
upvoted 0 times
Isadora
8 months ago
Let's go ahead and make that change then. It should improve the overall efficiency of our backups and replications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
8 months ago
Agreed, increasing the max concurrent jobs will prevent the replication jobs from waiting for the backups to complete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
8 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. It should help the replication jobs run smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
8 months ago
I think we should increase the 'Maximum concurrent jobs' in the storage server properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel