Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

VEEAM Exam VMCA2022 Topic 4 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for VEEAM's VMCA2022 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 4
[All VMCA2022 Questions]

To ensure SLA compliance and protection against ransomware, which of the following configurations would accomplish this goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

* Use Hardened Repositories as the primary target, which are Linux-based repositories that support immutability and prevent ransomware from accessing or deleting backup files12.

* Use backup copy jobs to create a second copy of the backups to a different site, which will provide additional protection and redundancy in case of a disaster or data loss34.

* Use Veeam Backup & Replication servers at one location, which will simplify the management and monitoring of the backup infrastructure and reduce the operational costs.

The other configurations are not as effective or secure, as they either do not use immutability, do not create a second copy of the backups, or do not leverage the benefits of Veeam Backup & Replication servers.


by Micaela at Nov 16, 2024, 07:56 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium VMCA2022 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dahlia
1 months ago
Wait, what's a 'Veeam'? Is that like a new superhero or something? I'm gonna go with Option C just because it sounds the coolest.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
23 days ago
Option C sounds cool, but I think Option A is the best choice for SLA compliance and protection against ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trina
1 months ago
Option B gets my vote. XFS with immutability on NFS targets? It's like they're speaking my language. I'm sold!
upvoted 0 times
Cecilia
1 days ago
User 2: I agree, that configuration seems like it would provide good protection against ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
29 days ago
User 1: Option B sounds great. XFS with immutability on NFS targets is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rebecka
2 months ago
Hmm, Option D looks good to me. Hardened Repositories? That's some next-level security right there. I bet the ransomware won't stand a chance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
2 months ago
I'd go with Option C. Leveraging object storage is the way to go these days. Plus, it's just fun to say 'object storage'.
upvoted 0 times
Pearly
15 days ago
Yeah, it's definitely a modern solution to consider for data protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
17 days ago
I agree, object storage seems like a reliable option for ensuring SLA compliance and protection against ransomware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
26 days ago
Option C sounds like a solid choice. Object storage is definitely becoming more popular.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eladia
2 months ago
But option A provides redundancy with two locations, which is important for SLA compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
2 months ago
Option A seems like a solid choice, with the ReFS repository and the backup copy to a second site. Gotta love that redundancy!
upvoted 0 times
Amie
1 months ago
Iesha: True, having a backup copy at a second site is crucial for SLA compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 months ago
User 3: Option D could also work with the hardened repositories for extra security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, having backups in two locations is important for protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
1 months ago
User 1: Option A does seem like a good choice, the redundancy is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eladia
2 months ago
I think option A would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel