US Green Building Council Exam LEED-AP-O+M Topic 3 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for US Green Building Council's LEED-AP-O+M exam

Question #: 1
Topic #: 3

[All LEED-AP-O+M Questions]

A benefit of recommending LED lamps in an environmentally preferable purchasing policy is that they

Aare rapidly renewable

Bhave no mercury content

Care adaptable to all existing fixtures have

Dlower up front costs than fluorescent lamps

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Recommending LED lamps in an environmentally preferable purchasing policy is beneficial because LED lamps contain no mercury. Unlike some other lighting options, such as compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) which can contain mercury, LEDs offer a safer alternative in terms of toxic substances. This makes LED lamps an environmentally friendly choice, reducing the risk of mercury pollution and facilitating easier, safer disposal or recycling of lamps at the end of their life cycle.

Reference: The LEED AP Operations + Maintenance documentation highlights the environmental and health benefits of selecting LED lighting, including the absence of mercury, which aligns with the goals of reducing hazardous substances in building environments.

by Abel at Nov 18, 2024, 11:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium LEED-AP-O+M Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Carma

1 months ago

Hah, 'rapidly renewable' - that's a good one! I bet the lamp manufacturers came up with that one to make their products sound more eco-friendly.

upvoted 0 times

Tu

5 days ago

D: Plus, they are more cost-effective than fluorescent lamps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

16 days ago

C: And they can be used in all existing fixtures, making them versatile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

16 days ago

B: Yeah, they have no mercury content, which is a big plus.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yoko

20 days ago

A: LED lamps are a great choice for the environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

1 months ago

Rapidly renewable? What, do they grow on trees or something? I'm a bit skeptical about that one.

upvoted 0 times

Franchesca

8 days ago

User 2

upvoted 0 times

...

Demetra

9 days ago

User 1

upvoted 0 times

...

Nelida

2 months ago

Lower upfront costs? Really? I thought LED lamps were still a bit pricey. Guess I need to do more research on the latest pricing.

upvoted 0 times

Shaun

18 days ago

D: A: LED lamps also have no mercury content, making them environmentally friendly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

23 days ago

C: B: Yes, they are more cost-effective in the long run due to their energy efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brynn

25 days ago

B: Really? I thought LED lamps were still a bit pricey.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miriam

1 months ago

A: LED lamps have lower upfront costs than fluorescent lamps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

2 months ago

But don't LED lamps have higher upfront costs than fluorescent lamps? That could be a drawback for some organizations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scarlet

2 months ago

The adaptability to existing fixtures is a big plus in my book. I hate having to replace all the light fixtures just to use a new lamp technology.

upvoted 0 times

Ronald

1 months ago

That's true, LED lamps are a win-win for both convenience and sustainability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

1 months ago

And don't forget, LED lamps also have no mercury content, which is great for the environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vilma

2 months ago

Definitely, it saves time and money not having to replace everything.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sang

2 months ago

I agree, it's so convenient to be able to use LED lamps with existing fixtures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

2 months ago

I agree with Lucy, LED lamps are a more sustainable option compared to fluorescent lamps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Toi

2 months ago

I definitely agree that the lack of mercury content in LED lamps is a major benefit. Mercury is such a nasty substance, and we don't want that in our buildings!

upvoted 0 times