Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

US Green Building Council LEED-AP-O+M Exam - Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Posted by Carmen on Nov 19, 2024 at 07:18 PM

What is the maximum distance food or beverage raw materials can be harvested and produced in order to achieve the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing?

Suggested Answer: D

The maximum distance for food or beverage raw materials to be harvested and produced for achieving the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing, is 100 miles (160 kilometers). This distance supports local economies and reduces the environmental impacts associated with transportation.


For the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing, food or beverage raw materials must be harvested and produced within a maximum distance of 100 miles (160 kilometers) from the project site. This criterion supports local agriculture and reduces the environmental impacts associated with transportation, contributing to a more sustainable supply chain.

Reference: This distance limitation is specified in the LEED AP Operations + Maintenance reference guide, particularly in the section on sustainable purchasing practices. The guide outlines how sourcing locally not only supports local economies but also minimizes carbon emissions related to transportation.

Get Premium LEED-AP-O+M Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
31 comments · newest first
LA
Lachelle 11 months ago
100 miles seems excessive for local food!
JA
Jarvis 11 months ago
I thought it was 75 miles, but I guess I was wrong.
MI
Micheal 12 months ago
Wait, is it really only 60 miles? Sounds too short.
EL
Ellsworth 12 months ago
Totally agree, local sourcing is key!
LE
Lemuel 1 year ago
It's 60 miles for that credit!
LO
Louvenia 1 year ago
I thought it was 85 miles, but I keep second-guessing myself. I should have reviewed that section more thoroughly!
VI
Vivienne 1 year ago
I’m leaning towards 100 miles, but I’m not confident. It seems like a reasonable distance for sourcing local materials.
KA
Kayleigh 1 year ago
I remember practicing a question like this, and I think it was 75 miles, but I could be mixing it up with another credit.
NO
Noel 1 year ago
I think the limit is around 60 miles, but I’m not completely sure. It feels like I’ve seen that number before in my notes.
AR
Arlene 1 year ago
Wait, I'm a little confused. Is this asking about the maximum distance or the minimum distance? I need to double-check the wording of the question and the credit requirements to make sure I'm interpreting this correctly. Gotta be careful on these tricky exam questions.
GI
Gilberto 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to find the option that matches the distance requirement for the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing. I'm pretty confident the answer is B, 75 mi. (120 km).
BE
Bernadine 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know the Materials and Resources Credit has some distance requirements, but I can't recall the exact numbers off the top of my head. I'll have to carefully read through the options to figure this out.
JA
Jaime 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the maximum distance for raw materials to be harvested and produced. I'll need to review the Materials and Resources Credit details to determine the correct answer.
JU
Judy 2 years ago
Hey, as long as the materials are fresh and delicious, who cares how far they traveled? I vote for D) 100 mi. (160 km) - the more the merrier!
GA
Galen 2 years ago
The correct answer is definitely A) 60 mi. (97 km). Anything beyond that is just plain greedy, like asking for extra guac at Chipotle.
AL
Alona 2 years ago
Ah, the old 'how far is too far' question. I'm going with C) 85 mi. (137 km) - right in the sweet spot!
KA
Kanisha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alona
User 2
CO
Colton 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alona
User 1
FR
Freeman 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. D) 100 mi. (160 km) seems a bit too far, don't you think?
KE
Kenneth 2 years ago
↳ replying to Freeman
I agree, D) 100 mi. (160 km) does seem like a stretch.
JE
Jerrod 2 years ago
↳ replying to Freeman
C) 85 mi. (137 km) might be pushing it a bit.
CO
Coletta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Freeman
I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) is a good balance.
DA
Daryl 2 years ago
↳ replying to Freeman
A) 60 mi. (97 km) seems more reasonable to me.
NO
Noelia 2 years ago
I see both points, but I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) strikes a good balance between supporting local economies and reducing transportation emissions.
CH
Chauncey 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) 100 mi. (160 km). We should prioritize access to a wider range of local and regional products.
PA
Pa 2 years ago
I think the answer is B) 75 mi. (120 km). That's the distance I learned in my prep course.
JO
Johnna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pa
Let's go with B) 75 mi. (120 km) as our final answer
HE
Heidy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pa
I remember studying that distance too, it must be the correct answer
DE
Dean 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pa
I'm not sure, but I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) sounds about right
PA
Pansy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Pa
I agree, I also think the answer is B) 75 mi. (120 km)
ER
Erasmo 2 years ago
I think the answer is A) 60 mi. (97 km). It makes sense to keep the distance short for sustainability.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel