Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

US Green Building Council Exam LEED-AP-O+M Topic 2 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for US Green Building Council's LEED-AP-O+M exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 2
[All LEED-AP-O+M Questions]

What is the maximum distance food or beverage raw materials can be harvested and produced in order to achieve the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The maximum distance for food or beverage raw materials to be harvested and produced for achieving the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing, is 100 miles (160 kilometers). This distance supports local economies and reduces the environmental impacts associated with transportation.


For the Materials and Resources Credit, Purchasing - Ongoing, food or beverage raw materials must be harvested and produced within a maximum distance of 100 miles (160 kilometers) from the project site. This criterion supports local agriculture and reduces the environmental impacts associated with transportation, contributing to a more sustainable supply chain.

Reference: This distance limitation is specified in the LEED AP Operations + Maintenance reference guide, particularly in the section on sustainable purchasing practices. The guide outlines how sourcing locally not only supports local economies but also minimizes carbon emissions related to transportation.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Judy
1 months ago
Hey, as long as the materials are fresh and delicious, who cares how far they traveled? I vote for D) 100 mi. (160 km) - the more the merrier!
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
1 months ago
The correct answer is definitely A) 60 mi. (97 km). Anything beyond that is just plain greedy, like asking for extra guac at Chipotle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
1 months ago
Ah, the old 'how far is too far' question. I'm going with C) 85 mi. (137 km) - right in the sweet spot!
upvoted 0 times
Kanisha
13 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
14 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freeman
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. D) 100 mi. (160 km) seems a bit too far, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
16 days ago
I agree, D) 100 mi. (160 km) does seem like a stretch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerrod
23 days ago
C) 85 mi. (137 km) might be pushing it a bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 months ago
I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) is a good balance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
1 months ago
A) 60 mi. (97 km) seems more reasonable to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noelia
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) strikes a good balance between supporting local economies and reducing transportation emissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) 100 mi. (160 km). We should prioritize access to a wider range of local and regional products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pa
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) 75 mi. (120 km). That's the distance I learned in my prep course.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
1 months ago
Let's go with B) 75 mi. (120 km) as our final answer
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
1 months ago
I remember studying that distance too, it must be the correct answer
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) 75 mi. (120 km) sounds about right
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
2 months ago
I agree, I also think the answer is B) 75 mi. (120 km)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) 60 mi. (97 km). It makes sense to keep the distance short for sustainability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel