Option D is the way to go. I mean, you can't just ignore the surrounding land that's impacted by your construction, can you? That would be like trying to build a house and pretending the yard doesn't exist.
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is an architect who loves drawing project boundaries. D is clearly the right answer, but I'm tempted to say A just to mess with them.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think C makes the most sense - the project should have a minimum size of 1,000 sq ft. Anything smaller doesn't seem like a real LEED project to me.
Definitely D. The project boundary should include any land that is altered due to construction, regardless of the building size or number of buildings.
Marcos
2 months agoLigia
2 months agoIzetta
6 days agoChara
7 days agoOliva
17 days agoArmando
1 months agoBilly
2 months agoBrigette
2 months agoOcie
2 months agoSlyvia
2 months agoMinna
3 months agoRoyal
3 months agoBrunilda
2 months agoSunny
2 months agoFairy
2 months agoLashaunda
2 months agoLou
2 months agoLemuel
3 months agoFiliberto
3 months agoBenton
3 months agoMinna
3 months ago