Option D is the way to go. I mean, you can't just ignore the surrounding land that's impacted by your construction, can you? That would be like trying to build a house and pretending the yard doesn't exist.
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is an architect who loves drawing project boundaries. D is clearly the right answer, but I'm tempted to say A just to mess with them.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think C makes the most sense - the project should have a minimum size of 1,000 sq ft. Anything smaller doesn't seem like a real LEED project to me.
Definitely D. The project boundary should include any land that is altered due to construction, regardless of the building size or number of buildings.
Marcos
8 days agoLigia
9 days agoBilly
15 days agoBrigette
17 days agoOcie
9 days agoSlyvia
10 days agoMinna
1 months agoRoyal
1 months agoBrunilda
16 days agoSunny
19 days agoFairy
22 days agoLashaunda
30 days agoLou
30 days agoLemuel
1 months agoFiliberto
1 months agoBenton
1 months agoMinna
1 months ago