Option D is the way to go. I mean, you can't just ignore the surrounding land that's impacted by your construction, can you? That would be like trying to build a house and pretending the yard doesn't exist.
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question is an architect who loves drawing project boundaries. D is clearly the right answer, but I'm tempted to say A just to mess with them.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think C makes the most sense - the project should have a minimum size of 1,000 sq ft. Anything smaller doesn't seem like a real LEED project to me.
Definitely D. The project boundary should include any land that is altered due to construction, regardless of the building size or number of buildings.
Marcos
5 months agoLigia
5 months agoIzetta
3 months agoChara
3 months agoOliva
3 months agoArmando
4 months agoBilly
5 months agoBrigette
5 months agoOcie
5 months agoSlyvia
5 months agoMinna
6 months agoRoyal
6 months agoBrunilda
5 months agoSunny
5 months agoFairy
5 months agoLashaunda
5 months agoLou
5 months agoLemuel
5 months agoFiliberto
6 months agoBenton
6 months agoMinna
6 months ago