UiPath Exam UiPath-ASAPv1 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-ASAPv1 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 1

Given the High-Level Diagram, what is the best improvement that the Solution Architect should make at the process level?

ASplit the process in two sub-processes - Performer and Reporter as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 to Step 6 Performer: Step 7

BSplit the process in three sub-processes - Dispatcher. Performer and Reporter as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 Performer: Step 2 to Step 4 Reporter: Step 5 to Step 7

CThere is no need of an improvement at the process level.

DSplit the process in two sub-processes - Dispatcher and Performer as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 Performer: Step 2 to Step 7

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Splitting the process into three distinct sub-processes - Dispatcher, Performer, and Reporter - aligns with best practices for RPA design, promoting modularity and scalability. The Dispatcher's role would be to initialize the process, such as identifying and queuing work items. The Performer would then take over to handle the core automation tasks (steps 2 to 4), focusing on processing the queued items. Finally, the Reporter would compile and present the results or outcomes of the automation (steps 5 to 7). This structure not only clarifies the process flow but also facilitates easier maintenance and updates, as each sub-process can be modified independently without affecting the others.

UiPath REFramework Guide: Dispatcher-Performer Model

UiPath Best Practices: Framework for Process Design

by Kristeen at Jul 04, 2024, 12:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium UiPath-ASAPv1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Rhea

3 months ago

Hmm, I wonder if the Solution Architect is feeling a bit 'Dispatcher-ical' today. Maybe they just need a 'Performer' of a solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosenda

3 months ago

Option D is the way to go, for sure. Keep it simple, stupid. Two sub-processes is the perfect solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

3 months ago

I don't know, the current process seems fine to me. Why fix what ain't broken, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Coral

2 months ago

I agree, splitting the process could help improve performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

2 months ago

Maybe we should consider splitting the process into sub-processes for better efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

2 months ago

I think the current process is fine as it is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

4 months ago

I think option C is valid too, sometimes no improvement is needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

4 months ago

But option A splits the process into Performer and Reporter, which can improve efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiley

4 months ago

Option B sounds like the best solution to me. Splitting it into three sub-processes seems like the most efficient way to handle the different steps.

upvoted 0 times

Dorothy

2 months ago

Option B does seem like the most efficient choice. It clearly defines the steps for each role.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefany

2 months ago

I agree, having separate sub-processes for Dispatcher, Performer, and Reporter makes it more organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

2 months ago

I think Option B is the way to go. It splits the process into three sub-processes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denae

3 months ago

Option B does sound like a good improvement. It's clear and organized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reid

3 months ago

Yeah, I agree. It seems like the most efficient way to handle the different steps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brinda

3 months ago

I think Option B is the way to go. It splits the process into three sub-processes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitsue

4 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annamaria

4 months ago

This process could definitely use some streamlining. I think splitting it into two sub-processes with a clear division of responsibilities is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Marla

3 months ago

D) Split the process in two sub-processes - Dispatcher and Performer as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 Performer: Step 2 to Step 7

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebeca

3 months ago

B) Split the process in three sub-processes - Dispatcher. Performer and Reporter as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 Performer: Step 2 to Step 4 Reporter: Step 5 to Step 7

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharita

4 months ago

A) Split the process in two sub-processes - Performer and Reporter as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 to Step 6 Performer: Step 7

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

4 months ago

I think the best improvement is option A.

upvoted 0 times

...