Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

UiPath Exam UiPath-ASAPv1 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for UiPath's UiPath-ASAPv1 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All UiPath-ASAPv1 Questions]

Given the High-Level Diagram, what is the best improvement that the Solution Architect should make at the process level?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Splitting the process into three distinct sub-processes - Dispatcher, Performer, and Reporter - aligns with best practices for RPA design, promoting modularity and scalability. The Dispatcher's role would be to initialize the process, such as identifying and queuing work items. The Performer would then take over to handle the core automation tasks (steps 2 to 4), focusing on processing the queued items. Finally, the Reporter would compile and present the results or outcomes of the automation (steps 5 to 7). This structure not only clarifies the process flow but also facilitates easier maintenance and updates, as each sub-process can be modified independently without affecting the others.


UiPath REFramework Guide: Dispatcher-Performer Model

UiPath Best Practices: Framework for Process Design

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rhea
18 days ago
Hmm, I wonder if the Solution Architect is feeling a bit 'Dispatcher-ical' today. Maybe they just need a 'Performer' of a solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
19 days ago
Option D is the way to go, for sure. Keep it simple, stupid. Two sub-processes is the perfect solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
22 days ago
I don't know, the current process seems fine to me. Why fix what ain't broken, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
30 days ago
I think option C is valid too, sometimes no improvement is needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 months ago
But option A splits the process into Performer and Reporter, which can improve efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
1 months ago
Option B sounds like the best solution to me. Splitting it into three sub-processes seems like the most efficient way to handle the different steps.
upvoted 0 times
Denae
6 days ago
User 3: Option B does sound like a good improvement. It's clear and organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reid
18 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It seems like the most efficient way to handle the different steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brinda
23 days ago
User 1: I think Option B is the way to go. It splits the process into three sub-processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
2 months ago
This process could definitely use some streamlining. I think splitting it into two sub-processes with a clear division of responsibilities is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Marla
11 days ago
D) Split the process in two sub-processes - Dispatcher and Performer as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 Performer: Step 2 to Step 7
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
18 days ago
B) Split the process in three sub-processes - Dispatcher. Performer and Reporter as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 Performer: Step 2 to Step 4 Reporter: Step 5 to Step 7
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
1 months ago
A) Split the process in two sub-processes - Performer and Reporter as follows: Dispatcher: Step 1 to Step 6 Performer: Step 7
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rory
2 months ago
I think the best improvement is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel