New Year Sale ! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group Exam OGEA-103 Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-103 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 4
[All OGEA-103 Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

Your role is that of a consultant to the Lead Enterprise Architect to an international supplier of

engineering services and automated manufacturing systems. It has three manufacturing plants

where it assembles both standard and customized products for industrial production

automation. Each of these plants has been operating its own planning and production

scheduling systems, as well as applications and control systems that drive the automated

production line.

The Enterprise Architecture department has been operating for several years and has mature,

well-developed architecture governance and development processes that are based on the

TOGAF Standard. The CIO sponsors the Enterprise Architecture.

During a recent management meeting, a senior Vice-President highlighted an interview where

a competitor company's CIO is reported as saying that their production efficiency had been

improved by replacing multiple planning and scheduling systems with a common Enterprise

Resource Planning (ERP) system located in a central data center. Some discussion followed,

with the CIO responding that the situations are not comparable, and the current architecture is

already optimized.

In response, the Architecture Board approved a Request for Architecture Work covering the

investigations to determine if such an architecture transformation would lead to improvements

in efficiency. You have been assigned to support the architecture team working on this project.

A well-known concern of the plant managers is about the security and reliability of driving their

planning and production scheduling from a remote centralized system. Any chosen system

would also need to support the current supply chain network consisting of local partners at

each of the plants.

Refer to the scenario

You have been asked to explain how you will initiate the architecture project.

Based on the TOGAF Standard, which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The best answer is C. You would hold a series of interviews at each of the manufacturing plants using the business scenarios technique. This will allow you to understand the systems and integrations with local partners. You would use stakeholder analysis to identify key players in the engagement, and to understand their concerns. You will then identify and document the key high-level stakeholder requirements for the architecture. You will then generate high level definitions of the baseline and target architectures.

This answer is based on the TOGAF standard, which recommends the following steps to initiate the architecture project1:

Establish the architecture project

Identify stakeholders, concerns, and business requirements

Confirm and elaborate business goals, business drivers, and constraints

Evaluate business capabilities

Assess readiness for business transformation

Define scope

Confirm and elaborate Architecture Principles, including business principles

Develop Architecture Vision

Define the Target Architecture value propositions and KPIs

Identify the business transformation risks and mitigation activities

Secure stakeholder and sponsor approval

The answer C covers most of these steps, by using the business scenarios technique to elicit and validate the business requirements, goals, drivers, and constraints, as well as the current and future states of the architecture2. The answer C also uses stakeholder analysis to identify and engage the key stakeholders, and to address their concerns and expectations3. The answer C also generates high level definitions of the baseline and target architectures, which can be used to develop the Architecture Vision and the value propositions4.

The other answers are not the best approach for architecture development, because:

Answer A focuses on researching vendor literature and conducting briefings with vendors, which is not the best way to understand the business needs and the current situation of the enterprise. Answer A also defines a preliminary Architecture Vision without involving the stakeholders or validating the requirements, which may lead to misalignment and lack of consensus.

Answer B conducts a pilot project that will enable vendors to demonstrate potential solutions, which is premature and costly at this stage of the architecture project. Answer B also does not address the stakeholder concerns or the current systems and integrations, which may result in gaps and risks. Answer B also develops the requirements after the pilot project, which may not reflect the actual business needs and goals.

Answer D develops baseline and target architectures for each of the manufacturing plants, which may not consider the enterprise-wide perspective and the potential benefits of a common ERP system. Answer D also does not involve the stakeholders or address their concerns, which may result in resistance and conflict. Answer D also does not define the business case or the performance metrics, which are essential for demonstrating the value and feasibility of the architecture.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Rosendo
3 months ago
Hey, if they really want to improve efficiency, they should just replace all the workers with robots. That'll fix it, right?
upvoted 0 times
Thurman
3 months ago
B: D) You would develop baseline and target Architectures for each of the manufacturing plants, ensuring that the views corresponding to selected viewpoints address key concerns of the stakeholders. A business case, together with performance metrics and measures should be defined to ensure the architecture meets the business needs. A consolidated gap analysis between the architectures will then validate the approach and determine the capability increments needed to achieve the target state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
3 months ago
A: B) You would conduct a pilot project that will enable vendors to demonstrate potential off-the-shelf solutions that address the concerns of the stakeholders. Running a pilot project will save time and money later in the process. Based on the findings of that pilot project, a complete set of requirements can then be developed that will drive the evolution of the architecture. Once the requirements are completed, a formal stakeholder review should be held, and permission sought to proceed to develop the target architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antione
3 months ago
I like the idea of a pilot project in option B, but I'm not sure if that's the best use of time and resources. Shouldn't we get a clear understanding of the requirements first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
3 months ago
Option D looks solid, but I'm worried about the amount of work involved in developing baseline and target architectures for each plant. Seems a bit overkill for the initial phase.
upvoted 0 times
Jean
3 months ago
B: I agree, it's crucial to ensure that the architecture meets the business needs and addresses stakeholders' concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
3 months ago
A: Option D does seem like a lot of work, but it's important to have a clear plan for each plant's architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettyann
4 months ago
Option A sounds good, but I'm not sure about the vendor research. Shouldn't we focus on the internal stakeholder requirements first?
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
3 months ago
C) You would hold a series of interviews at each of the manufacturing plants using the business scenarios technique. This will allow you to understand the systems and integrations with local partners. You would use stakeholder analysis to identify key players in the engagement, and to understand their concerns. You will then identify and document the key high-level stakeholder requirements for the architecture. You will then generate high level definitions of the baseline and target architectures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
3 months ago
B) That's a good idea. Running a pilot project would allow us to gather feedback from both internal and external stakeholders, helping us tailor the architecture project to meet everyone's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
3 months ago
A) I see your point about focusing on internal stakeholder requirements first. Maybe conducting a pilot project as in option B could help address both internal and external stakeholder concerns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
3 months ago
B) You would conduct a pilot project that will enable vendors to demonstrate potential off-the-shelf solutions that address the concerns of the stakeholders. Running a pilot project will save time and money later in the process. Based on the findings of that pilot project, a complete set of requirements can then be developed that will drive the evolution of the architecture. Once the requirements are completed, a formal stakeholder review should be held, and permission sought to proceed to develop the target architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
3 months ago
B) You would conduct a pilot project that will enable vendors to demonstrate potential off-the-shelf solutions that address the concerns of the stakeholders. Running a pilot project will save time and money later in the process. Based on the findings of that pilot project, a complete set of requirements can then be developed that will drive the evolution of the architecture. Once the requirements are completed, a formal stakeholder review should be held, and permission sought to proceed to develop the target architecture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
3 months ago
A) You would research vendor literature and conduct a series of briefings with vendors that are on the current approved supplier list. Based on the findings from the research, you would define a preliminary Architecture Vision including summary views, high-level requirements, and high-level definitions of the baseline and target environments from a business, information systems, and technology perspective. You would then use that to build consensus among the key stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
3 months ago
A) You would research vendor literature and conduct a series of briefings with vendors that are on the current approved supplier list. Based on the findings from the research, you would define a preliminary Architecture Vision including summary views, high-level requirements, and high-level definitions of the baseline and target environments from a business, information systems, and technology perspective. You would then use that to build consensus among the key stakeholders.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louisa
4 months ago
I agree with Kathrine, option A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
4 months ago
I personally think option C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
4 months ago
Hmm, I think option C is the best way to go. Interviewing the plant managers and understanding their concerns is crucial before jumping into any architecture decisions.
upvoted 0 times
Tanja
3 months ago
Yes, conducting interviews and using stakeholder analysis will help identify key requirements and ensure the architecture aligns with business needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodrigo
4 months ago
I agree, understanding the concerns of the plant managers is key to a successful architecture project.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathrine
4 months ago
I think option A is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
4 months ago
I think option C is the way to go, conducting interviews at each plant will help understand the systems and integrations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
4 months ago
I prefer option B, running a pilot project will save time and money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lina
4 months ago
I agree, conducting briefings with vendors will help define the Architecture Vision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
4 months ago
I think option A is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel