Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group Exam OGEA-103 Topic 3 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-103 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 3
[All OGEA-103 Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

You are the Lead Enterprise Architect at a major agribusiness company. The company's main

annual harvest is lentils, a highly valued food grown worldwide. The lentil parasite, broomrape,

has been an increasing concern for many years and is now becoming resistant to chemical

controls. In addition, changes in climate favor the propagation and growth of the parasite. As a

result, the parasite cannot realistically be exterminated, and it has become pandemic, with lentil

yields falling globally.

The CEO appreciates the seriousness of the situation and has set out a change in direction

that is effectively a new business for the company. There are opportunities for new products,

and new markets. The company will use the fields for another harvest and will cease to process

third-party lentils. Thus, the target market will change, and the end-products will be different

and more varied. This is a major decision and the CEO has stated a desire to repurpose rather

than replace so as to manage the risks and limit the costs.

The company has a mature Enterprise Architecture practice based in its headquarters and uses

the TOGAF standard as the method and guiding framework. The practice has an established

Architecture Capability, and uses iteration for architecture development. The CIO is the sponsor

of the activity.

The CIO has assigned the Enterprise Architecture team to this activity. At this stage there is no

shared vision, or requirements.

Refer to the scenario

You have been asked to propose the best approach for architecture development to realize the

CEO's change in direction for the company.

Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Based on the TOGAF standard, this answer is the best approach for architecture development to realize the CEO's change in direction for the company. The reason is as follows:

The scenario describes a major business transformation that requires a clear understanding of the current and future states of the enterprise, as well as the gaps and opportunities for change. Therefore, the priority is to understand and bring structure to the definition of the change, rather than focusing on the implementation details or the technology aspects.

The team should use the TOGAF ADM as the method and guiding framework for architecture development, and adapt it to suit the specific needs and context of the enterprise. The team should also leverage the existing Architecture Capability and the Architecture Repository to reuse and integrate relevant architecture assets and resources.

The team should focus iteration cycles on a baseline first approach to architecture development, which means starting with the definition of the Baseline Architecture in each domain (Business, Data, Application, and Technology), and then defining the Target Architecture in each domain. This will help to identify the current and desired states of the enterprise, and to perform a gap analysis to determine what needs to change in order to achieve the business goals and objectives.

The team should then focus on transition planning, which involves identifying and prioritizing the work packages, projects, and activities that will deliver the change. The team should also create an Architecture Roadmap and an Implementation and Migration Plan that will guide the execution and governance of the change.

The team should use the Architecture Vision phase and the Requirements Management phase to work out in detail what the shared vision is for the change, and to capture and validate the stakeholder requirements and expectations. The team should also use the Architecture Governance framework to ensure the quality, consistency, and compliance of the architecture work.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Audra
16 days ago
I'm with Darrin on this one. Option D is the most comprehensive and logical approach to tackling this complex situation. Plus, it has the added benefit of not being 'broomrape-d' by the CEO's demands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
29 days ago
Haha, option B sounds like a classic 'let's start with the infrastructure' approach. That's not going to cut it for this kind of major business transformation.
upvoted 0 times
Ma
1 days ago
D) You propose that the team focus its iteration cycles on architecture development by going through the architecture definition phases (B-D) with a baseline first approach. This will support the change in direction as stated by the CEO. It will ensure that the change can be defined in a structured manner and address the requirements needed to realize the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
8 days ago
C) You propose that the priority is to understand and bring structure to the definition of the change. The team should focus iteration cycles on a baseline first approach to architecture development, and then transition planning. This will identify what needs to change in order to transition from the baseline to the target, and can be used to work out in detail what the shared vision is for the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
16 days ago
A) You propose that the team focus on architecture definition, with emphasis on defining the change parameters to support this new business strategy that the CEO has identified. Once understood, the team will be in the best position to identify the requirements, drivers, issues, and constraints for the change. You would ensure that the architecture development addresses non-functional requirements to assure that the target architecture is robust and secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilma
1 months ago
Option C focuses on defining the change and bringing structure to it, which is crucial for transitioning to the new business strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
1 months ago
I disagree, I think option C is the way to go. Defining the baseline first and then focusing on transition planning will help us understand the change better and work out the details of the shared vision.
upvoted 0 times
Sabra
13 days ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
19 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cruz
1 months ago
Why do you think option C is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
1 months ago
The best approach is definitely option D. Going through the architecture definition phases in a structured way will ensure that the change is well-defined and all the requirements are addressed.
upvoted 0 times
Elenora
15 days ago
Definitely, following the architecture definition phases will support the CEO's change in direction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
24 days ago
This approach will ensure that all requirements needed for the change are addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
26 days ago
I agree, focusing on architecture development with a baseline first approach is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
1 months ago
Option D is the way to go. It will help define the change in a structured manner.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilma
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
2 months ago
I think option A is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel