Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

The Open Group Exam OGEA-103 Topic 2 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for The Open Group's OGEA-103 exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 2
[All OGEA-103 Questions]

Please read this scenario prior to answering the question

You are the Chief Enterprise Architect at a large food service company specializing in sales to trade and

wholesale, for example, restaurants and other food retailers.

One of your company's competitors has launched a revolutionary product range and is running a very

aggressive marketing campaign. Your company's resellers are successively announcing that they are not

interested in your company's products and will sell your competitor's.

The CEO has stated there must be significant change to address the situation. He has made it clear that

new markets must be found for the company's products, and that the business needs to pivot, and address the retail market as well as the existing wholesale market.

A consideration is the company's ability and willingness to change its business model, and if it is a temporary or permanent change. An additional risk factor is one of culture. The company has been used to a stable business with a reasonably well known and settled client base - all with its own local understandings and practices.

The CEO is the sponsor of the EA program within the company. You have been engaged with the sales,

logistics, production, and marketing teams, enabling the architecture activity to start. An Architecture Vision, Architecture Principles, and Requirements have all been agreed. As you move forward to develop a possible Target Architecture you have identified that some of the key stakeholders' preferences are incompatible. The incompatibilities are focused primarily on time-to-market, cost savings, and the need to bring out a fully featured product range, but there are additional factors.

Refer to the scenario

You have been asked how you will address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences.

Based on the TOGAF standard which of the following is the best answer?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

According to the TOGAF standard, the Target Architecture is the description of a future state of the architecture being developed for an organization. It should be aligned with the Architecture Vision, Principles, and Requirements that have been agreed with the stakeholders. To address the incompatibilities between key stakeholder preferences, the TOGAF standard recommends creating and evaluating multiple alternative Target Architectures that meet different sets of criteria. These criteria should reflect the value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders, as well as the business drivers and objectives. The alternative Target Architectures should be illustrated using a set of architecture views that show the impact of each alternative on the business, data, application, and technology domains. The impact on planned projects should also be identified and analyzed. The strengths and weaknesses of each alternative should be understood and documented. A formal stakeholder review should then be conducted to decide which alternative is the most fit for purpose and should be moved forward with. The funding required for implementing the chosen alternative should also be determined and secured.Reference:

The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase B: Business Architecture - The Open Group

The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase C: Information Systems Architectures - The Open Group

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase D: Technology Architecture - The Open Group]

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions - The Open Group]

[The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase F: Migration Planning - The Open Group]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Viola
23 days ago
You know, I heard the CEO's idea of a 'revolutionary product range' is just a fancy way of saying 'gluten-free donuts'. But hey, if it keeps the competition at bay, I'm all for it! Just don't expect me to taste-test those things, okay?
upvoted 0 times
Yvette
5 days ago
B: D) You would review the Stakeholder Map and ensure that you have addressed and represented the concerns of all department heads. You will involve them in resolving the incompatibilities. The Communications Plan should include a report that summarizes the key features of the architecture with and how incompatibilities were resolved to reflects the stakeholders' requirements. You will check with each key stakeholder they are satisfied with how the incompatibilities have been resolved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
7 days ago
A: A) You would seek to understand value preferences and priorities of the stakeholders. You would develop alternative Target Architectures, highlighting the gaps between current state and the alternatives. You would consider combining features from one or more alternatives in collaboration with the stakeholders. A formal stakeholder review should then be held to decide which alternative is fit for purpose and should be moved forward with. You will then secure the funding required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francesco
24 days ago
Hold up, are we sure the CEO isn't just messing with us? I mean, 'significant change' and 'pivot'? Sounds like a recipe for chaos. But hey, if I had to pick, I'd go with option D. Gotta keep those stakeholders happy, right? Especially the boss-man.
upvoted 0 times
Leeann
3 days ago
I agree, the CEO's sudden push for change is a bit unsettling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
25 days ago
I see your point, Justa. Option C does seem like a thorough way to address the incompatibilities and make an informed decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
1 months ago
I personally think option C is the best choice. It involves creating architecture views to illustrate the impact of the alternatives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
1 months ago
Ah, the classic dilemma of cost savings versus feature-rich products. I'd go with option C - use those architecture views to really show the stakeholders the pros and cons of each option. Can't go wrong with a good ol' fashioned pros and cons list!
upvoted 0 times
Lakeesha
2 days ago
Definitely. A thorough analysis will help in making an informed choice on how to move forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
8 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each option before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madonna
16 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
19 days ago
Option C sounds like a solid plan. Showing the stakeholders the impact of the alternative architectures is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
22 days ago
Option C sounds like a solid plan. Showing the stakeholders the impact of the alternative architectures is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Apolonia
1 months ago
I agree with you, Susana. Option A seems like the most logical approach to address the incompatibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 months ago
I think option A is the best answer because it involves collaboration with stakeholders to decide on the best alternative.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
1 months ago
I'm all about that time-to-market, so I'm leaning towards option B. Why waste time on a full product range when we can just get something out there fast and then build it up later? Efficiency is key, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
2 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one! I think option A is the way to go. Gotta understand those stakeholder preferences and priorities, and then work with them to come up with the best solution. Teamwork makes the dream work, right?
upvoted 0 times
Melda
9 days ago
Definitely, working together to address the incompatibilities is the way to go. It's all about finding the best fit for everyone involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
19 days ago
I agree, teamwork is crucial in situations like this. It's all about finding common ground.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
21 days ago
Collaboration is definitely important. We need to work together to find the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
1 months ago
Option A sounds like a solid plan. Understanding stakeholder values is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel