Haha, Version 1.0? More like Version 0.5 if you ask me. But seriously, I think D is the way to go here. Anything less just wouldn't cut it for a TOGAF architecture.
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. But I'm going to go with D just to be safe. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture sounds like it would be considered Version 1.0.
I'm going with B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture. That seems like the most logical step in the TOGAF ADM cycle before moving to a detailed version.
I think the answer is D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture. Anything less than that doesn't seem like it would be denoted as Version 1.0, right?
Annmarie
6 months agoJacquelyne
5 months agoYuonne
5 months agoSharee
5 months agoMarshall
6 months agoKizzy
6 months agoGeorgene
5 months agoElmira
5 months agoLarae
5 months agoJeannetta
6 months agoErnestine
6 months agoTy
7 months agoOzell
7 months agoLeatha
7 months agoAnthony
7 months agoSommer
5 months agoJaime
6 months agoLouvenia
6 months agoCharlesetta
6 months ago