Haha, Version 1.0? More like Version 0.5 if you ask me. But seriously, I think D is the way to go here. Anything less just wouldn't cut it for a TOGAF architecture.
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. But I'm going to go with D just to be safe. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture sounds like it would be considered Version 1.0.
I'm going with B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture. That seems like the most logical step in the TOGAF ADM cycle before moving to a detailed version.
I think the answer is D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture. Anything less than that doesn't seem like it would be denoted as Version 1.0, right?
Annmarie
3 months agoJacquelyne
2 months agoYuonne
2 months agoSharee
2 months agoMarshall
4 months agoKizzy
4 months agoGeorgene
3 months agoElmira
3 months agoLarae
3 months agoJeannetta
3 months agoErnestine
4 months agoTy
4 months agoOzell
4 months agoLeatha
4 months agoAnthony
4 months agoSommer
3 months agoJaime
3 months agoLouvenia
3 months agoCharlesetta
4 months ago