Haha, Version 1.0? More like Version 0.5 if you ask me. But seriously, I think D is the way to go here. Anything less just wouldn't cut it for a TOGAF architecture.
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. But I'm going to go with D just to be safe. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture sounds like it would be considered Version 1.0.
I'm going with B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture. That seems like the most logical step in the TOGAF ADM cycle before moving to a detailed version.
I think the answer is D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture. Anything less than that doesn't seem like it would be denoted as Version 1.0, right?
Annmarie
2 months agoJacquelyne
23 days agoYuonne
24 days agoSharee
26 days agoMarshall
2 months agoKizzy
2 months agoGeorgene
1 months agoElmira
1 months agoLarae
1 months agoJeannetta
2 months agoErnestine
3 months agoTy
3 months agoOzell
3 months agoLeatha
3 months agoAnthony
3 months agoSommer
2 months agoJaime
2 months agoLouvenia
2 months agoCharlesetta
2 months ago