Haha, Version 1.0? More like Version 0.5 if you ask me. But seriously, I think D is the way to go here. Anything less just wouldn't cut it for a TOGAF architecture.
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. But I'm going to go with D just to be safe. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture sounds like it would be considered Version 1.0.
I'm going with B. A formally reviewed, preliminary architecture. That seems like the most logical step in the TOGAF ADM cycle before moving to a detailed version.
I think the answer is D. A formally reviewed, detailed architecture. Anything less than that doesn't seem like it would be denoted as Version 1.0, right?
Annmarie
25 days agoMarshall
1 months agoKizzy
1 months agoGeorgene
4 days agoElmira
5 days agoLarae
10 days agoJeannetta
29 days agoErnestine
2 months agoTy
2 months agoOzell
2 months agoLeatha
2 months agoAnthony
2 months agoSommer
13 days agoJaime
26 days agoLouvenia
27 days agoCharlesetta
1 months ago