Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Tableau Exam TCC-C01 Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Tableau's TCC-C01 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 1
[All TCC-C01 Questions]

A client wants to flag orders that have sales higher than the regional average.

Which calculated field will produce the required result?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To flag orders with sales higher than the regional average, the correct calculated field would compare the sum of sales for each order against the average sales of all orders within the same region:

Correct Formula: { FIXED [Order ID] : SUM([Sales]) } > { FIXED [Region] : AVG({ FIXED [Order ID] : SUM([Sales]) }) }

This calculation uses a Level of Detail (LOD) expression:

The left part of the formula { FIXED [Order ID] : SUM([Sales]) } calculates the total sales for each individual order.

The right part { FIXED [Region] : AVG({ FIXED [Order ID] : SUM([Sales]) }) } calculates the average sales per order within each region.

The > operator is used to compare these two values to determine if the sales for each order exceed the regional average.

Reference This formula utilizes Tableau's LOD expressions to perform complex comparisons across different dimensions of the data, as explained in Tableau's official training materials on LOD calculations.


Contribute your Thoughts:

MonBouj
24 days ago
Option C correctly aggregates sales at the order level and compares it to the average order sales within the region, making it the best choice for flagging orders with sales higher than the regional average.
upvoted 1 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
I'm going with B. It's the simplest solution, and sometimes simple is best. Plus, who doesn't love a good old-fashioned regional average? It's like the pumpkin spice latte of data analytics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
2 months ago
But C calculates the average sales per order ID for each region, which is what the client wants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
2 months ago
Ah, the old 'fix by order, then by region' trick. Classic. Option C gets my vote. Though I do like how D includes the whole region. Maybe I should hedge my bets and pick both?
upvoted 0 times
Paris
1 months ago
True, it's a tough choice between Option C and Option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Camellia
1 months ago
But Option D also has its merits by including the whole region.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 months ago
I agree, Option C is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
2 months ago
Option C is the way to go for flagging orders above the regional average.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
2 months ago
I'm torn between B and C, but I think C is the better choice. Calculating the regional average is key, and the nested fixed expressions will ensure we get the correct values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'm gonna go with D, just to be different. Who needs averages when you can include the whole region, right? It's a bold move, but I'm feeling lucky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Desire
2 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Fixing by Order ID to get the total sales per order, then fixing by Region to calculate the average sales per region. That should give us the required result.
upvoted 0 times
Laticia
1 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the most logical choice for flagging orders with sales higher than the regional average.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 months ago
Yeah, option C makes sense. It flags orders with sales higher than the regional average by fixing the calculations in that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
2 months ago
I think option C is the correct one. It calculates the average sales per region after summing the sales per order.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Suzi
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel