Splunk Exam SPLK-2001 Topic 4 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Splunk's SPLK-2001 exam

Question #: 68
Topic #: 4

[All SPLK-2001 Questions]

When the search/jobs REST endpoint is called to execute a search, what can be done to reduce the results size in the results? (Select all that apply.)

AUse a generating search.

BRemove unneeded fields.

CTruncate the data, using selective functions.

DSummarize data, using analytic commands.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, B

by Rossana at Aug 06, 2024, 08:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SPLK-2001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lon

2 months ago

I think using a generating search can also be effective in reducing the results size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Suzi

3 months ago

I believe summarizing data using analytic commands can also help in reducing results size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

3 months ago

I agree with Portia, removing unneeded fields can definitely help.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilda

3 months ago

I know the perfect solution - just use a search that generates more results than we need, then truncate the data. Boom, problem solved!

upvoted 0 times

...

Marleen

3 months ago

Wait, you mean I can't just call the endpoint and expect a full-length novel in the response? Dang, these developers are really cramping my style.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

3 months ago

This is a no-brainer. B), C), and D) are the way to go. Reduce, reduce, reduce! Why bother with all the extra when you can just get to the point?

upvoted 0 times

Sylvia

2 months ago

It's all about efficiency. Less is more when it comes to search results.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frank

2 months ago

Agreed, removing unneeded fields, truncating data, and summarizing data are essential.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

2 months ago

Definitely! B), C), and D) are key to reducing the results size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Portia

3 months ago

I think we can reduce the results size by removing unneeded fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

3 months ago

I think using a generating search can also be effective in reducing the results size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brett

3 months ago

B) and C) are the way to go. Trim the fat and get right to the good stuff. No need for all the fluff.

upvoted 0 times

Felicitas

2 months ago

D) Summarize data, using analytic commands.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

2 months ago

Agreed, that will definitely help reduce the results size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

2 months ago

C) Truncate the data, using selective functions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

2 months ago

B) Remove unneeded fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tom

3 months ago

I believe summarizing data using analytic commands can also help in reducing results size.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

3 months ago

D) Summarize data, using analytic commands sounds like a great way to get the job done. Gotta love those big brain analytics!

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

3 months ago

I think B) Remove unneeded fields is the way to go. Who needs all that bloat anyway? Keep it lean and mean!

upvoted 0 times

Gilbert

2 months ago

Yeah, keeping it lean and mean will make the results more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawanna

2 months ago

I agree, removing unneeded fields is definitely the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theola

3 months ago

I agree with Linette, removing unneeded fields can definitely help.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linette

3 months ago

I think we can reduce the results size by removing unneeded fields.

upvoted 0 times

...