Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SolarWinds Exam SCP-NPM Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for SolarWinds's SCP Network Performance Monitor (NPM) Exam exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 1
[All SCP Network Performance Monitor (NPM) Exam Questions]

Your network has critical devices on the opposite side of a WAN link from you SolarWinds server. You do not want alerts about the devices if the router (name = ''target'') that connects your SolarWinds server to the remote site is down. How do you configure Alert Suppression?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Laticia at Jul 01, 2024, 01:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SCP-NPM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jerilyn
1 months ago
I see your point, Danica. I think Hildegarde's answer makes more sense in this scenario. We should suppress alerts when the Interface Status is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
1 months ago
But if the router is down, wouldn't we want to suppress alerts when the Interface Status is down as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
1 months ago
Option C all the way. Monitoring the interface status is the most logical approach here. Plus, it's just more efficient than checking the node status, which could be misleading.
upvoted 0 times
Lavelle
18 days ago
I agree, monitoring the interface status is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
1 months ago
Haha, I almost went with option D. Like, 'Hey, let's just ignore the device if it's completely offline!' Nice try, SolarWinds, but I'm not falling for that one.
upvoted 0 times
Sheron
3 days ago
Lizette: Definitely, better to be safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
4 days ago
User 3: I agree, we don't want to miss important alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
9 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I think option A is the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
25 days ago
User 2: Yeah, option D seems a bit risky. We don't want to ignore the device completely if it's down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
28 days ago
User 1: I think option A is the way to go. It only suppresses the alert when the Interface Status is 'Warning'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivan
1 months ago
User 1: I know right, option D seems a bit extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hildegarde
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) Suppress alert when any of the following apply: Node Name is equal to ''target'' / Interface Status is equal to ''Down''
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
2 months ago
I agree with Lashonda. Option C is the way to go. Monitoring the interface status instead of the node status is a more accurate way to detect the router being down.
upvoted 0 times
Brendan
22 days ago
I agree, monitoring the interface status will give a more precise indication of the router being down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
23 days ago
I think Option C is the best choice. Monitoring the interface status is more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Danica
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) Suppress alert when all of the following apply: Node Name is equal to ''target'' / Interface Status is equal to ''Warning''
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
2 months ago
Option C is the correct answer. Suppressing alerts when the router's interface is down makes the most sense, as that's the key condition we want to monitor.
upvoted 0 times
Crista
2 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
2 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel