Software Certifications Exam CSQA Topic 2 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Software Certifications's CSQA exam

Question #: 94
Topic #: 2

If you were to read in a publication that an IT organization could build software at a rate of 4 lines of code per programmer hour, but in your organization you can only write 2 lines of code per programmer hour, what conclusion could you draw?

AMy organization is less efficient than the other

BMy organization's programmers are not as well trained

CThere is no accepted standard for lines of code

DMy organization is a candidate for outsourcing

EMy organization needs more experienced programmers

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Hubert at Aug 08, 2024, 09:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSQA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Mose

3 months ago

We might need more experienced programmers to improve our efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawana

3 months ago

I believe there is no accepted standard for lines of code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodrigo

3 months ago

Maybe our programmers are not as well trained as the other organization's.

upvoted 0 times

...

Berry

3 months ago

Outsourcing, huh? Not a chance! My boss would rather chew off his own arm than let someone else touch our code. Looks like we're stuck with option E and hiring more experienced programmers. Good luck with that budget proposal!

upvoted 0 times

Orville

2 months ago

E) My organization needs more experienced programmers

upvoted 0 times

...

Sina

3 months ago

A) My organization is less efficient than the other

upvoted 0 times

...

Carrol

3 months ago

I think our organization is less efficient than the other.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

4 months ago

Hold on, does the publication even define what counts as a 'line of code'? Maybe my team is working on more complex projects that require fewer lines. I'm going with option C - there's no accepted standard here.

upvoted 0 times

Georgeanna

2 months ago

I agree, there's no one-size-fits-all definition of what a 'line of code' is.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

3 months ago

Yeah, that could be it. It's hard to compare efficiency without knowing the details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

3 months ago

Maybe the other organization is just writing simple code, while we're working on more complex projects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

4 months ago

We could consider outsourcing if we can't improve efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

4 months ago

Well, if my organization is only doing 2 lines per hour, that means we're half as efficient as the publication claims. Guess we need to get our act together and hire some real coding wizards.

upvoted 0 times

Laticia

3 months ago

B) My organization's programmers are not as well trained

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

3 months ago

E) My organization needs more experienced programmers

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

3 months ago

A) My organization is less efficient than the other

upvoted 0 times

...

Alberta

4 months ago

There might not be an accepted standard for lines of code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Desire

4 months ago

Maybe our programmers are not as well trained.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tran

4 months ago

I think our organization is less efficient than the other.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

4 months ago

Hah, 4 lines of code per hour? I bet the authors were just making that up to make their organization look good. My team writes code at a snail's pace, but at least it works!

upvoted 0 times