BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ARA-C01 Topic 6 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ARA-C01 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 6
[All ARA-C01 Questions]

A company has a source system that provides JSON records for various loT operations. The JSON Is loading directly into a persistent table with a variant field. The data Is quickly growing to 100s of millions of records and performance to becoming an issue. There is a generic access pattern that Is used to filter on the create_date key within the variant field.

What can be done to improve performance?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is A because it improves the performance of queries by reducing the amount of data scanned and processed. By adding a create_date field with a timestamp data type, Snowflake can automatically cluster the table based on this field and prune the micro-partitions that do not match the filter condition. This avoids the need to parse the JSON data and access the variant field for every record.

Option B is incorrect because it does not improve the performance of queries. By adding a create_date field with a varchar data type, Snowflake cannot automatically cluster the table based on this field and prune the micro-partitions that do not match the filter condition. This still requires parsing the JSON data and accessing the variant field for every record.

Option C is incorrect because it does not address the root cause of the performance issue. By validating the size of the warehouse being used, Snowflake can adjust the compute resources to match the data volume and parallelize the query execution. However, this does not reduce the amount of data scanned and processed, which is the main bottleneck for queries on JSON data.

Option D is incorrect because it adds unnecessary complexity and overhead to the data loading and querying process. By incorporating the use of multiple tables partitioned by date ranges, Snowflake can reduce the amount of data scanned and processed for queries that specify a date range. However, this requires creating and maintaining multiple tables, loading data into the appropriate table based on the date, and joining the tables for queries that span multiple date ranges.Reference:

Snowflake Documentation: Loading Data Using Snowpipe: This document explains how to use Snowpipe to continuously load data from external sources into Snowflake tables. It also describes the syntax and usage of the COPY INTO command, which supports various options and parameters to control the loading behavior, such as ON_ERROR, PURGE, and SKIP_FILE.

Snowflake Documentation: Date and Time Data Types and Functions: This document explains the different data types and functions for working with date and time values in Snowflake. It also describes how to set and change the session timezone and the system timezone.

Snowflake Documentation: Querying Metadata: This document explains how to query the metadata of the objects and operations in Snowflake using various functions, views, and tables. It also describes how to access the copy history information using the COPY_HISTORY function or the COPY_HISTORY view.

Snowflake Documentation: Loading JSON Data: This document explains how to load JSON data into Snowflake tables using various methods, such as the COPY INTO command, the INSERT command, or the PUT command. It also describes how to access and query JSON data using the dot notation, the FLATTEN function, or the LATERAL join.

Snowflake Documentation: Optimizing Storage for Performance: This document explains how to optimize the storage of data in Snowflake tables to improve the performance of queries. It also describes the concepts and benefits of automatic clustering, search optimization service, and materialized views.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Xochitl
29 days ago
Haha, option C is a classic case of 'throw more hardware at the problem.' While that might work, partitioning the data is a more elegant and scalable solution.
upvoted 0 times
Aron
2 days ago
Definitely, partitioning can help optimize queries and make the system more scalable in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Soledad
8 days ago
I agree, partitioning seems like a more efficient solution than just throwing more hardware at the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
14 days ago
Option D sounds like a good idea. Partitioning the data by date ranges can really help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shasta
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option B. Using a varchar datatype for the create_date field might not be as efficient as a timestamp for date-based filtering.
upvoted 0 times
Diane
9 days ago
Hmm, I agree with option A. Using a timestamp datatype for date-based filtering would definitely be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
19 days ago
D) Incorporate the use of multiple tables partitioned by date ranges. When a user or process needs to query a particular date range, ensure the appropriate base table Is used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
26 days ago
A) Alter the target table to Include additional fields pulled from the JSON records. This would Include a create_date field with a datatype of time stamp. When this field Is used in the filter, partition pruning will occur.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Willard
1 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. Validating the warehouse size seems like a good idea, but I think partitioning the data with multiple tables might be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
2 months ago
I agree with Bok. Partitioning the data can definitely help with filtering on the create_date key more efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
2 months ago
I'd go with option A. Creating a dedicated create_date field with a timestamp datatype will allow the database to leverage partition pruning and speed up the queries.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryll
9 days ago
Let's go with option A then, it seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
12 days ago
Partition pruning will be a game changer for speeding up the queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
18 days ago
Option A it is then. Let's go with that for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
23 days ago
I agree, having a dedicated create_date field with a timestamp datatype seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
26 days ago
I agree, having a dedicated create_date field will make a big difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonie
1 months ago
Option A seems like the best choice. It will definitely help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebeca
1 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. It will help with partition pruning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celestina
2 months ago
Definitely option D. Partitioning the table by date ranges will significantly improve query performance, especially for the common use case of filtering on the create_date field.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
1 months ago
Partitioning by date ranges will definitely help with managing the large amount of data efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 months ago
It's important to optimize the table structure for better performance, and partitioning seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
1 months ago
I agree, partitioning by date ranges will make it easier to query specific date ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
2 months ago
Option D is a great choice. Partitioning by date ranges will definitely help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bok
2 months ago
I think option D could help improve performance by partitioning the data into multiple tables based on date ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel