BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Snowflake Exam ADA-C01 Topic 2 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Snowflake's ADA-C01 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 2
[All ADA-C01 Questions]

What is a characteristic of Snowflake's transaction locking and concurrency modeling?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

According to the Snowflake documentation1, Snowflake uses a multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) model, which means that each transaction operates on a consistent snapshot of the database at a point in time. This allows queries and DML statements to run concurrently without blocking each other, as they do not modify the same data. Therefore, a deadlock, which occurs when concurrent transactions are waiting on resources that are locked by each other, cannot happen in Snowflake. Option B is incorrect because queries and DML statements do not block each other in Snowflake, unless they are explicitly started transactions and multiple statements in each transaction2. Option C is incorrect because transaction locking in Snowflake is enforced at the partition level, not the row or table level3. Option D is incorrect because queries executed within a given transaction do not see that transaction's uncommitted changes, but only the committed changes that occurred before the transaction started1.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jennie
1 months ago
All these options sound like some kind of sorcery to me. I'll just go with whichever one has the most dragons in it.
upvoted 0 times
Kimberlie
9 days ago
C) Transaction locking in Snowflake is enforced exclusively at the row and table levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
15 days ago
B) If two queries are concurrently executed against the same table, one of the two queries will be blocked until the other query completes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
16 days ago
A) A deadlock cannot occur in Snowflake, since concurrently executed queries and DML statements do not block one another.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chauncey
1 months ago
But A makes sense because Snowflake does not block queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
1 months ago
D looks good to me. Being able to see your own uncommitted changes is a must-have feature.
upvoted 0 times
Delbert
9 days ago
User 4: Snowflake's transaction locking and concurrency modeling seems really efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
10 days ago
User 3: Definitely, it helps with maintaining data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
26 days ago
I agree, it's important to have that visibility within a transaction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
1 months ago
D looks good to me. Being able to see your own uncommitted changes is a must-have feature.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Andree
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
2 months ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 months ago
I'm going with C. Locking at the row and table levels is the way to go for a data warehouse like Snowflake.
upvoted 0 times
Lisha
21 days ago
I see your point, but I still think B is the best option. One query will be blocked if two are executed concurrently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
23 days ago
I'm sticking with C. Locking at the row and table levels makes the most sense for Snowflake.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe D is the right choice. Queries within a transaction see uncommitted changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
I think A is the correct answer. Deadlocks cannot occur in Snowflake.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emilio
2 months ago
A seems legit. No deadlocks? Sounds like a dream come true for developers!
upvoted 0 times
Oren
2 months ago
That does sound like a dream come true for developers!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
2 months ago
A deadlock cannot occur in Snowflake, since concurrently executed queries and DML statements do not block one another.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel