Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Slack Exam Slack-Certified-Admin Topic 9 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Slack's Slack-Certified-Admin exam
Question #: 62
Topic #: 9
[All Slack-Certified-Admin Questions]

Tam Corp sells 15 versions of their software to customers around the world. They have a global team (e.g., sales, engineering, support, and human resources) of 500 employees.

Tam Corp is moving to the Enterprise Grid plan from two workspaces on the Plus plan. On their current Plus plan, they organize one workspace by team (e.g., #sales-team, #engineering-team, and #support-team), and the other workspace is primarily for recruiting discussions and the leadership team.

Leadership does not want the move from Plus to Grid to significantly impact how teams are communicating today.

When considering how to structure the Enterprise Grid, what is the structure that aligns with leadership and allows the teams to communicate most effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lizette at Aug 23, 2024, 08:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Slack-Certified-Admin Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lorrine
10 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards C, but I can see the argument for B as well. Grouping by product line could work, but I think the 'primary' workspace idea is the way to go. Either way, they need to keep the teams talking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
10 months ago
Let's see... I'd say C as well. Maintaining the current workflow is key, and having a 'primary' workspace for each employee sounds like the best way to do that. Plus, it's more efficient than creating a ton of separate workspaces.
upvoted 0 times
Hui
9 months ago
Definitely, it's important to maintain efficiency and not create unnecessary workspaces. C seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
9 months ago
Creating workspaces based on how information is shared sounds like a smart move for a company like Tam Corp.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
9 months ago
Agreed, having one 'primary' workspace for each employee makes it easier to focus on their main tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
9 months ago
I think C is the best option too. It keeps things organized and doesn't disrupt current communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ngoc
10 months ago
Wait, did you say 15 versions of the software? Man, that's a lot of product lines! I hope they have a good bug bounty program, or else their support team is gonna be drowning in tickets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
10 months ago
I see your point, Stephaine. But I personally think option D would work best, as it allows for each product line to have its own channel for communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marnie
10 months ago
Okay, this looks like a tricky one. I think the best option is C - create workspaces based on how information is shared, with each employee having a 'primary' workspace. That way, teams can still communicate effectively without disrupting the current workflow.
upvoted 0 times
Dominque
9 months ago
I think option D could also work well, having one workspace with channels for each product line. It could streamline communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
10 months ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice. It allows for effective communication without major disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C would be better as it focuses on how information is shared and ensures employees have a primary workspace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
10 months ago
I think option A makes sense, it aligns with leadership and allows for effective communication within departments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel