BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Sitecore Exam Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Sitecore's Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 4
[All Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Questions]

What Sitecore Content Serialization command can a developer use to ensure that they don't forget to pull changes made within a developer-managed location?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The Sitecore serialization plugin provides the serialization command with the short form ser1. This command handles the serialization of items in and out of a Sitecore instance1. You can use the watch subcommand to monitor changes to content items in a Sitecore instance and automatically serialize the changes to your file system1. This way, you can ensure that you don't forget to pull changes made within a developer-managed location1.


The CLI serialization command

Sitecore Content Serialization structural overview

by Cathrine at May 21, 2024, 03:20 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sitecore-XM-Cloud-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Carolynn
5 months ago
Haha, the 'watch' command? Really? That's like trying to watch paint dry. Gotta be B, the sync command, all the way. Easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and D. The package create command could be useful for packaging up those changes, but the sync command is probably the safer bet. 50/50 on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Renea
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. The package create command might be useful, but the sync command is probably safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
5 months ago
I agree, the sync command is probably the best choice here. It's better to be safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
5 months ago
Yeah, the sync command is definitely the safer option. It helps keep everything up to date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
5 months ago
I think the sync command is the way to go. It ensures you don't forget to pull changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
5 months ago
I think the sync command is the way to go. It ensures you don't forget to pull changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
5 months ago
Yeah, the sync command is definitely the safer option. It helps keep everything up to date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
I think the sync command is the way to go. It ensures you don't forget to pull changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
6 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with B as well. The sync command just makes the most sense for keeping track of those pesky developer changes. Wouldn't want to accidentally leave anything behind!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
6 months ago
The sync command seems like the obvious choice here. I mean, who wants to forget about changes in a developer-managed location? Definitely going with B.
upvoted 0 times
Lottie
5 months ago
The sync command is a lifesaver when it comes to managing changes in developer locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
5 months ago
I think we can all benefit from using the sync command regularly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
5 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
5 months ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliann
5 months ago
The sync command is definitely the best option to avoid missing any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
6 months ago
I always use the sync command to make sure I have the latest changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
6 months ago
I agree, the sync command is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel