Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Sitecore Discussions
Exam Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Topic 7 Question 37 Discussion
Sitecore Exam Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Topic 7 Question 37 Discussion
Actual exam question for Sitecore's Sitecore Experience Solution 9 Developer Certification Exam exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 7
[All Sitecore Experience Solution 9 Developer Certification Exam Questions]
How can you define renderings as compatible?
A
modifying a field in their data definition
B
modifying a field in their field definition
C
modifying a field in their component definition
D
None
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
C
by
Blair
at
Jun 30, 2024, 01:07 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Lisandra
14 days ago
I'm so confused. I thought renderings were supposed to be compatible out of the box. This is like trying to herd cats!
upvoted
0
times
...
Tess
15 days ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards C, but I wish they'd just make renderings auto-compatible. That would be the dream!
upvoted
0
times
...
Louann
16 days ago
I'm going with A. Modifying the data definition sounds like the logical way to handle compatibility.
upvoted
0
times
...
Bettyann
17 days ago
D. None of the above. Renderings are already compatible by default, right?
upvoted
0
times
...
Rebbecca
18 days ago
Definitely C. Changing the component definition is the key to ensuring compatibility.
upvoted
0
times
Kimberlie
6 days ago
I think it's A, modifying the data definition is what makes renderings compatible.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lovetta
11 days ago
I agree, modifying the component definition is crucial for compatibility.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Novella
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think renderings are not defined as compatible by modifying any field. So, I would go with option D) None.
upvoted
0
times
...
Elenor
2 months ago
I think it's option B. Modifying the field definition seems like the way to go to make renderings compatible.
upvoted
0
times
Jamika
13 days ago
I think it's option B too. Modifying the field definition sounds like the right approach.
upvoted
0
times
...
Bettyann
18 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be option A. Modifying a field in the data definition could also work.
upvoted
0
times
...
Annmarie
22 days ago
I think it's option C. Modifying a field in the component definition makes more sense to me.
upvoted
0
times
...
Cortney
27 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Loreen
2 months ago
I think renderings are defined as compatible by modifying a field in their field definition. That's the most common way.
upvoted
0
times
...
Graham
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe renderings are defined as compatible by modifying a field in their component definition.
upvoted
0
times
...
Herman
2 months ago
I think renderings are defined as compatible by modifying a field in their data definition.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Lisandra
14 days agoTess
15 days agoLouann
16 days agoBettyann
17 days agoRebbecca
18 days agoKimberlie
6 days agoLovetta
11 days agoNovella
1 months agoElenor
2 months agoJamika
13 days agoBettyann
18 days agoAnnmarie
22 days agoCortney
27 days agoLoreen
2 months agoGraham
2 months agoHerman
2 months ago