Sitecore Exam Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Topic 7 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Sitecore's Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer exam

Question #: 37
Topic #: 7

[All Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Questions]

How can you define renderings as compatible?

Amodifying a field in their data definition

Bmodifying a field in their field definition

Cmodifying a field in their component definition

DNone

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Blair at Jun 30, 2024, 01:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lisandra

3 months ago

I'm so confused. I thought renderings were supposed to be compatible out of the box. This is like trying to herd cats!

upvoted 0 times

...

Tess

3 months ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards C, but I wish they'd just make renderings auto-compatible. That would be the dream!

upvoted 0 times

Jamal

2 months ago

Yeah, that would be so much easier if renderings were just auto-compatible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

3 months ago

I think it's C, modifying a field in their component definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

3 months ago

I'm going with A. Modifying the data definition sounds like the logical way to handle compatibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettyann

3 months ago

D. None of the above. Renderings are already compatible by default, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rebbecca

3 months ago

Definitely C. Changing the component definition is the key to ensuring compatibility.

upvoted 0 times

Trevor

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it's B, modifying the field definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberlie

3 months ago

I think it's A, modifying the data definition is what makes renderings compatible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lovetta

3 months ago

I agree, modifying the component definition is crucial for compatibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

4 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think renderings are not defined as compatible by modifying any field. So, I would go with option D) None.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenor

4 months ago

I think it's option B. Modifying the field definition seems like the way to go to make renderings compatible.

upvoted 0 times

Jamika

3 months ago

I think it's option B too. Modifying the field definition sounds like the right approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bettyann

3 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think it might be option A. Modifying a field in the data definition could also work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annmarie

3 months ago

I think it's option C. Modifying a field in the component definition makes more sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cortney

4 months ago

I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreen

4 months ago

I think renderings are defined as compatible by modifying a field in their field definition. That's the most common way.

upvoted 0 times

...

Graham

5 months ago

I disagree, I believe renderings are defined as compatible by modifying a field in their component definition.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herman

5 months ago

I think renderings are defined as compatible by modifying a field in their data definition.

upvoted 0 times

...