BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Sitecore Discussions
Exam Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion
Sitecore Exam Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Topic 2 Question 39 Discussion
Actual exam question for Sitecore's Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 2
[All Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Questions]
How can you define renderings as compatible?
A
modifying a field in their data definition
B
modifying a field in their field definition
C
modifying a field in their component definition
D
None
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
C
by
Robt
at
Jul 13, 2024, 01:28 AM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium Sitecore-Experience-Solution-9-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Carma
3 months ago
I'm going with C. Modifying the component definition just seems like the most logical way to ensure compatibility.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rolande
3 months ago
Haha, I bet the answer is actually 'E) Sacrifice a goat during a full moon.'
upvoted
0
times
...
Kimbery
3 months ago
D) None? Really? That can't be right. Surely there must be a way to define renderings as compatible.
upvoted
0
times
Susy
2 months ago
C) modifying a field in their component definition
upvoted
0
times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
B) modifying a field in their field definition
upvoted
0
times
...
Vicky
2 months ago
A) modifying a field in their data definition
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Laurena
4 months ago
I don't think any of the options are correct, I would go with D) None.
upvoted
0
times
...
Anisha
4 months ago
I think renderings can be defined as compatible by modifying a field in their field definition.
upvoted
0
times
...
Nada
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Modifying the component definition seems like it could also work. This is a tricky one!
upvoted
0
times
Louisa
2 months ago
C) modifying a field in their component definition
upvoted
0
times
...
Chi
2 months ago
B) modifying a field in their field definition
upvoted
0
times
...
Louisa
3 months ago
A) modifying a field in their data definition
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Rutha
4 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. Modifying a field in the field definition sounds like the way to ensure compatibility.
upvoted
0
times
Joesph
3 months ago
Yes, modifying a field in the field definition would definitely help ensure compatibility.
upvoted
0
times
...
Jaime
4 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Felix
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe renderings are defined as compatible by modifying a field in their component definition.
upvoted
0
times
...
Dyan
4 months ago
I think renderings are defined as compatible by modifying a field in their data definition.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Carma
3 months agoRolande
3 months agoKimbery
3 months agoSusy
2 months agoAntonio
2 months agoVicky
2 months agoLaurena
4 months agoAnisha
4 months agoNada
4 months agoLouisa
2 months agoChi
2 months agoLouisa
3 months agoRutha
4 months agoJoesph
3 months agoJaime
4 months agoFelix
4 months agoDyan
4 months ago