BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-SGP Topic 7 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 7
[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

What are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, E

According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting and calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries are two recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. The article states that ''To track expenditures, the Program Backlog can be tagged with funding metadata for future reporting. Additionally, a fixed cost labor cost per ART can be calculated based on actual salaries. This simplifies the tracking of labor costs and allows for more accurate forecasting.'' Therefore, the correct answers are A, tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting, and E, calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the recommendations for tracking expenditures using the Program Backlog. Organizing ARTs by funding classification (B) is not a recommended practice, as it may create silos and reduce collaboration across ARTs. Including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement is not a necessary step, as the backlog items should be prioritized based on value and not on cost. Using charge codes assigned by each program (D) is not a simple or effective way to track expenditures, as it may introduce overhead and complexity.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cristina
25 days ago
This is a trick question, right? I mean, who needs to track expenditures when you can just use the force to bend the budget to your will? #JediBacklogMaster
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
26 days ago
A and D, no doubt. Tagging and charge codes are the bread and butter of any good backlog tracking system. The other options are just trying to distract us from the real deal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
28 days ago
B and C, definitely. Organizing by funding and including a fiduciary expert sounds like a surefire way to keep those bean-counters happy. Who needs charge codes when you've got the financial guru on your side?
upvoted 0 times
Lillian
7 days ago
C) Including a fiduciary expert in backlog refinement
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
13 days ago
B) Organizing ARTs by funding classification
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
1 months ago
I'm torn between A and E. While A is the obvious choice, E could be a clever way to get a more accurate cost estimate. Hmm, decisions, decisions.
upvoted 0 times
Leonora
4 days ago
B) Organizing ARTs by funding classification
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
10 days ago
E) Calculating a fixed cost labor cost per ART based on actual salaries
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
19 days ago
A) Tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Toi
1 months ago
I prefer using charge codes assigned by each program for tracking expenditures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
1 months ago
I agree with Coletta, it helps with future reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 months ago
I think tagging backlog items with funding metadata is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 months ago
A and D, of course! Tagging backlog items and using charge codes are the way to go for tracking expenditures. Anything else is just fluff.
upvoted 0 times
Francine
21 days ago
A and D, of course! Tagging backlog items and using charge codes are the way to go for tracking expenditures. Anything else is just fluff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
28 days ago
D) Using charge codes assigned by each program
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
1 months ago
A) Tagging backlog items with funding metadata for future reporting
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel