Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
US
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Linux Foundation
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Scaled Agile Discussions
Exam SAFe-RTE Topic 1 Question 24 Discussion
Scaled Agile Exam SAFe-RTE Topic 1 Question 24 Discussion
Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-RTE exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 1
[All SAFe-RTE Questions]
What are two benefits of having a team definition of done? (Choose two.)
A
To measure the team's capacity to load ratio
B
To increase predictability
C
To collect team performance metrics
D
To improve quality
E
To gauge team predictability
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
C
by
Claribel
at
Feb 08, 2024, 05:31 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium SAFe-RTE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Annamae
9 months ago
We need to address this anti-pattern to ensure smoother PI Planning in the future.
upvoted
0
times
...
Catrice
9 months ago
I agree, a centralized approach can sometimes result in overlooking team inputs and priorities.
upvoted
0
times
...
Kristel
9 months ago
Maybe the planning decisions have been centralized, leading to this misalignment.
upvoted
0
times
...
Chau
10 months ago
I think this issue is due to lack of collaboration in prioritization. It should have been a team effort.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tegan
10 months ago
Yeah, it's disrupting the whole planning process. It seems like prioritization was done autonomously.
upvoted
0
times
...
Vincent
10 months ago
I can't believe the Product Manager showed up with a wish list that doesn't align with our priorities.
upvoted
0
times
...
Rima
10 months ago
I agree. Planning decisions being centralized could also lead to this kind of anti-pattern.
upvoted
0
times
...
Glennis
10 months ago
That's true, but in this scenario, the problem seems to be more about how the prioritization was done.
upvoted
0
times
...
Nadine
10 months ago
But shouldn't there be strong alignment between business and marketing to avoid these kind of issues?
upvoted
0
times
...
Rima
11 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. When decisions are made without collaboration, it can lead to conflicts during planning.
upvoted
0
times
...
Glennis
11 months ago
I think the issue is that prioritization by Product Management was performed autonomously not collaboratively.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
Annamae
9 months agoCatrice
9 months agoKristel
9 months agoChau
10 months agoTegan
10 months agoVincent
10 months agoRima
10 months agoGlennis
10 months agoNadine
10 months agoRima
11 months agoGlennis
11 months ago