Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Saviynt Exam SAVIGA-C01 Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Saviynt's SAVIGA-C01 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All SAVIGA-C01 Questions]

An Application Owner Campaign can have multiple primary Certifiers and a single secondary Certifier.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The statement 'An Application Owner Campaign can have multiple primary Certifiers and a single secondary Certifier' is generally False in Saviynt. Here's why:

Saviynt's Application Owner Campaign: This campaign type is designed for Application Owners to review and certify access to their applications.

Primary Certifier: There is usually a single designated Application Owner for each application. This is because application ownership is typically a single point of accountability. While it is technically possible to assign multiple owners, it is not considered a best practice.

Secondary Certifiers (Backup/Delegates): Application Owner Campaigns can have multiple secondary certifiers. These are often used as:

Backup: To ensure the campaign can proceed if the primary certifier is unavailable.

Delegates: To allow the primary certifier to delegate some of the certification tasks.

Consultants: Other stakeholders, such as security or compliance teams, who can be consulted during the decision-making process.

Why the Statement Is Generally False: The core principle of application ownership implies a single point of accountability. While multiple secondary certifiers can assist, having multiple primary certifiers can lead to confusion and conflicting decisions.

Possible Exceptions (Less Common):

Highly Customized Configurations: In some very specific scenarios, organizations might customize Saviynt to allow multiple primary certifiers for an application, but this is not a standard or recommended practice.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Maira
2 months ago
True, False, who cares? I'm just here for the free donuts they promised at the end of the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
Wait, there's a secondary Certifier? What is this, a game of musical chairs? I'll go with False just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Trina
1 months ago
I'm sticking with False, I don't want to risk it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
1 months ago
I'll go with True as well, it makes sense to have multiple primary Certifiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
1 months ago
I agree, but I'm not sure about the secondary Certifier part.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
1 months ago
I think it's True, there can be multiple primary Certifiers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm going to go with True on this one. Seems logical to have multiple primary Certifiers to cover all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
Valene
4 days ago
Having a single secondary Certifier makes sense for a clear hierarchy in the campaign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darnell
5 days ago
True, it's important to have multiple primary Certifiers for accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
6 days ago
I think it's True as well, having a backup Certifier as secondary is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
7 days ago
I agree, having multiple primary Certifiers makes sense for thorough verification.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Veda
2 months ago
False, that doesn't sound right. I think there can only be one primary Certifier, not multiple.
upvoted 0 times
Lashandra
1 months ago
False, that doesn't sound right. I think there can only be one primary Certifier, not multiple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
1 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's True. That's how the certification process works in my experience.
upvoted 0 times
Van
2 months ago
I agree, it makes sense to have multiple primary Certifiers for an Application Owner Campaign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vilma
2 months ago
Why do you think it's false?
upvoted 0 times
...
Slyvia
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
3 months ago
I think the statement is true.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel