Alright, let's do this! Okay, I've crunched the numbers, and I'm pretty sure the answer is 8*8. Although, I have to admit, I'm a little disappointed that none of the options include 7*7. That would have really thrown me for a loop!
Hah, this question is a real brainteaser! I'm gonna have to go with 8*8 on this one. After all, who wants to be the sucker that picks 10*10 and gets it wrong? Not this guy, that's for sure. Although, if I'm being honest, I'm kind of hoping someone else goes with 4*4 just so I can have a good laugh.
I'm going with option C, 8*8. The math checks out, and it makes the most sense given the information provided. Though, I have to say, the person who wrote this question must have been feeling a bit cheeky. 10*10? Really? What is this, amateur hour?
Hmm, let me think about this. The input image is 28*28, and the first convolutional layer has 6 filters of size 5*5 with a stride of 1, which should give us a 24*24 feature map. Then, the max pooling layer with a 2*2 window and stride of 2 should give us a 12*12 output. Not sure why the question mentions 10*10, though.
I think the output tensor size is 8*8. The max pooling layer with a 2x2 window and stride of 2 should reduce the spatial dimensions by half, resulting in an 8*8 output.
Elliot
10 months agoDusti
10 months agoRosita
10 months agoMaxima
10 months agoKaycee
10 months agoFausto
10 months agoMerilyn
10 months agoSerina
10 months agoLynna
10 months agoLonny
10 months agoMarva
9 months agoLevi
10 months agoMiss
10 months agoLouis
10 months agoShoshana
10 months agoNoe
10 months agoShayne
10 months agoDaniela
10 months ago