Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAS Exam A00-260 Topic 12 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAS's A00-260 exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 12
[All A00-260 Questions]

Within SAS Data Integration Studio, automatic mappings are disabled for a job. A transformation has defined source columns and defined target columns. One of the source columns, named COLI, is character with a length of 50. One of the target columns, named COLI, is also character but of length 25. What will happen if the COLI columns are mapped?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Barrett at Oct 23, 2024, 12:59 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium A00-260 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Xenia
2 months ago
I bet the real-life equivalent of this question would be like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Good luck with that one!
upvoted 0 times
Joesph
1 months ago
It's like trying to force something to fit where it doesn't quite match up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
2 months ago
D) The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, but a warning occurs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
2 months ago
I wonder if the system will automatically adjust the length of the target column.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
2 months ago
A) The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, with no warnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marg
3 months ago
Wait, so the COLI column has the same name but different lengths? That's just confusing. No wonder this question is so tough!
upvoted 0 times
Viola
2 months ago
User1: So, option A is the correct answer then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
2 months ago
User2: Yeah, they can be mapped one-to-one without any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 months ago
User1: I think the COLI columns can still be mapped, even with different lengths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jodi
3 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going to go with option D. It seems like the most reasonable outcome in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
2 months ago
I agree with you, option D seems like the most reasonable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C as the most likely outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
3 months ago
I think option A is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noemi
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, with no warnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C sounds like it could be the right answer, with an expression defined to handle the length difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
3 months ago
Option B seems more likely to me. The lengths are different, so the COLI columns shouldn't be mapped at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
3 months ago
I think option D is the correct answer. The COLI columns will be mapped one-to-one, but a warning will occur due to the length difference.
upvoted 0 times
Annabelle
2 months ago
D) The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, but a warning occurs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
2 months ago
C) The COLI columns are mapped but an expression is defined for the target COLI that uses a generic specification of the LENGTH function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
2 months ago
B) The COLI columns are not mapped because the lengths are different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
3 months ago
A) The COLI columns are successfully mapped, one-to-one, with no warnings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Flo
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) The COLI columns are not mapped because the lengths are different.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel