BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam P_SAPEA_2023 Topic 3 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_SAPEA_2023 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 3
[All P_SAPEA_2023 Questions]

Which of the following are the best architectural decisions for an extension application in S/4HANA?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The decision for the extension model in S/4HANA should be based on the nature of the extension required. Developer Extensibility (in-app extensibility) is suitable for data-intensive extensions that need to operate within the context of S/4HANA. This is because it allows for direct access to S/4HANA's digital core and leverages the power of the HANA database. It is the recommended approach when the extension requires tight integration with core data and processes, ensuring high performance and data consistency.

On the other hand, Side-by-Side Extensibility on SAP BTP ABAP Environment is recommended when the extensions need to utilize additional SAP BTP services such as advanced analytics, machine learning, IoT services, or when creating new user experiences with SAPUI5. This decouples the extensions from the S/4HANA core, which can be beneficial in terms of flexibility, agility, and reducing the impact on the core system during upgrades.

Reference = These practices are supported by SAP's extensibility guide for S/4HANA, which explains the two extensibility models and their appropriate use cases. SAP documentation on ABAP Platform extensibility options provides further insights into when to choose each extensibility approach. SAP Best Practices for Extensibility in SAP S/4HANA guide provides a comprehensive view on how to extend the digital core effectively while maintaining system integrity and upgradeability.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jaclyn
5 days ago
Ah, the age-old debate of 'build it in-house' vs 'leverage the cloud'. Option A looks like a great balance between the two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
7 days ago
I like how Option C clearly differentiates the use cases for each approach. Keeping the UI separate from core ABAP logic is a sound architectural decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
13 days ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it specifies the use of Developer Extensibility for ABAP extensions that do not require a UI component.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
16 days ago
I think option A is the best choice because it covers both data-intensive ABAP extensions and SAPUI5 user interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
19 days ago
Option B seems the most comprehensive and flexible choice. Separating data-intensive extensions from UI-driven ones is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel