SAP Exam P_SAPEA_2023 Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_SAPEA_2023 exam

Question #: 33
Topic #: 1

[All P_SAPEA_2023 Questions]

As Chief Enterprise Architect, you want to select an extension option that follows SAP's clean-core strategy. What are your recommendations to implement the clean-core strategy best?

ATo follow the clean-core strategy, the so-called 'Developer Extensibility' of S/4HANA isn't allowed. Extensions must use 'Side-by-Side Extensibility' on the SAP Business Technology Platform. These extensions use corresponding public remote APIs of the S/4HANA backend system.

BFollow SAP's Tier 1 to Tier 2 extension model, which enables different extension options: Cloud Extensibility Model and Cloud API Enablement. This allows the development of cloud- ready and upgrade-stable applications and extensions.

CUse 'Key User Extensibility' functions of S/4HANA for simple extensions. 'Developer Extensibility must comply with the rules for a Tier-1 or Tier-2 extension.

DUse of public local APIs or public remote APIs for 'Developer Extensibility.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The clean-core strategy is a SAP initiative to keep the core of SAP S/4HANA as clean as possible by moving customizations and extensions to the side-by-side layer. This allows SAP to more easily deliver new releases of S/4HANA without having to worry about breaking custom code.

There are two main ways to extend SAP S/4HANA:

Developer Extensibility:This allows developers to extend the core of SAP S/4HANA by modifying the source code. This is not allowed under the clean-core strategy.

Side-by-Side Extensibility:This allows developers to extend SAP S/4HANA by creating new applications that run alongside the core system. These applications can communicate with the core system using public APIs.

The following are the benefits of using Side-by-Side Extensibility:

Flexibility:Side-by-Side Extensibility allows developers to extend SAP S/4HANA in any way they see fit.

Scalability:Side-by-Side Extensibility can be scaled to meet the needs of any organization.

Maintainability:Side-by-Side Extensibility is easier to maintain than Developer Extensibility, because custom code is not embedded in the core system.

Therefore, the best way to implement the clean-core strategy is to use Side-by-Side Extensibility. This will allow you to extend SAP S/4HANA in a flexible, scalable, and maintainable way.

by Lacey at Sep 14, 2024, 06:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium P_SAPEA_2023 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Adelina

30 days ago

I'm sorry, but I'm too busy trying to figure out how to make my coffee machine work with SAP to worry about this question. Anyone know a good API for that?

upvoted 0 times

...

Walton

1 months ago

I'm a bit confused by all these extension options. I just want to get my job done! Can we get a simpler answer, please?

upvoted 0 times

Alayna

3 days ago

B) Follow SAP's Tier 1 to Tier 2 extension model, which enables different extension options: Cloud Extensibility Model and Cloud API Enablement. This allows the development of cloud-ready and upgrade-stable applications and extensions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margot

6 days ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

8 days ago

A) To follow the clean-core strategy, the so-called 'Developer Extensibility' of S/4HANA isn't allowed. Extensions must use 'Side-by-Side Extensibility' on the SAP Business Technology Platform. These extensions use corresponding public remote APIs of the S/4HANA backend system.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawna

20 days ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Dona

1 months ago

Option C looks good to me. Using the 'Key User Extensibility' for simple extensions and following the Tier-1 or Tier-2 rules for 'Developer Extensibility' seems like a solid strategy.

upvoted 0 times

Bonita

13 days ago

Definitely, following the recommended extension models will make it easier to manage and upgrade the system in the future.

upvoted 0 times

...

Walton

20 days ago

I think sticking to the rules for Tier-1 or Tier-2 extensions will help maintain system stability and compatibility in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Herminia

29 days ago

I agree, it's important to ensure that the extensions are in line with SAP's guidelines for a clean-core strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

1 months ago

Option C looks good to me. Using the 'Key User Extensibility' for simple extensions and following the Tier-1 or Tier-2 rules for 'Developer Extensibility' seems like a solid strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

German

2 months ago

I prefer option B. Following SAP's Tier 1 to Tier 2 extension model allows for different extension options like Cloud Extensibility Model and Cloud API Enablement, which can lead to cloud-ready and upgrade-stable applications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

2 months ago

I'm leaning towards option A. Keeping extensions on the SAP Business Technology Platform and using public remote APIs is the cleanest approach in my opinion.

upvoted 0 times

Rupert

30 days ago

I'm not sure about option D, using public local APIs or public remote APIs for Developer Extensibility seems less clean compared to the other options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

1 months ago

Option C might be simpler for basic extensions, but I see the appeal of using public remote APIs in option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maira

1 months ago

I think option B could also be a good option, as it allows for cloud-ready and upgrade-stable applications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

1 months ago

I agree, option A seems like the best choice for following SAP's clean-core strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

My

2 months ago

I agree with Whitney. Option A ensures that extensions use corresponding public remote APIs of the S/4HANA backend system, which is important for maintaining a clean-core strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

2 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. It follows SAP's clean-core strategy and uses Side-by-Side Extensibility on the SAP Business Technology Platform.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

2 months ago

I think option B is the way to go. The Tier 1 to Tier 2 extension model seems to offer the most flexibility and alignment with SAP's clean-core strategy.

upvoted 0 times

Gertude

1 months ago

I think option B is the best choice as well. It allows for cloud-ready and upgrade-stable applications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gertude

2 months ago

I agree, option B provides a good balance between flexibility and alignment with SAP's clean-core strategy.

upvoted 0 times

...