Ooh, selecting activity prices from other CO-versions? Sounds like a trick question to me. I'm sticking with B and D as the right answers. Less complexity is always a win in my book.
Haha, reduced number of steps in the calculation cockpit? If only it were that easy! I'll go with B and D as the correct answers. Gotta love those SAP upgrades that make our lives easier.
I'm not sure about the other options, but I think actual costing in SAP S/4HANA does not involve selection of activity prices of other CO-versions in the standard run.
I agree with Glory. Option B and D seem to be the most relevant features here. Wish I had that simplified data structure when I was doing my costing in the old system!
I think the correct answers are B and D. The simplified data structure and combined run for standard and alternative valuations are definitely key features of actual costing in S/4HANA.
Jerrod
3 months agoGeoffrey
2 months agoGeoffrey
3 months agoGeoffrey
3 months agoDorcas
3 months agoCoral
4 months agoMerissa
2 months agoGlenn
2 months agoMerilyn
2 months agoJoanna
3 months agoCandra
4 months agoLetha
4 months agoJuliann
4 months agoDahlia
3 months agoDahlia
4 months agoLizette
4 months agoRosendo
3 months agoGarry
3 months agoLina
3 months agoGladys
3 months agoLouisa
4 months agoLawana
4 months agoAide
5 months agoCecil
5 months agoBernadine
5 months agoGlory
5 months agoLon
4 months agoMattie
4 months ago