I'm feeling confident with B and D. Streamlining the data structure and combining the runs? Sounds like SAP is finally catching up to the 21st century. Although, I heard the developers celebrated with a LAN party after nailing down these new features. Explains the 'simplified' part, I suppose.
I'm not sure about the reduced number of steps, but I think actual costing in SAP S/4HANA includes selection of activity prices of other CO-versions in the standard run.
A and D look good to me. Anything that helps me avoid the standard run is a plus. I mean, who needs 'activity prices of other CO-versions' anyway? Sounds like a whole lot of unnecessary complexity.
I'm going with B and D. Reducing table structures and combining runs sounds like a recipe for efficiency. Although, I heard the SAP team had a bake-off to decide on the new features. Probably explains the 'simplified' part.
Simona
5 days agoEden
16 days agoGolda
17 days agoSherell
18 days agoMose
25 days agoCorinne
20 hours agoJaleesa
2 days agoKatina
11 days agoTresa
18 days agoFernanda
1 months agoOna
1 months agoDean
4 days agoBeatriz
21 days agoShenika
22 days agoWalker
1 months agoJamal
25 days agoJamal
28 days agoLili
2 months ago