A and D, all the way! Selecting activity prices from other versions and the combined run, that's the real deal. Though I'm not sure about the 'reduced number of steps' - maybe they just made the cockpit more confusing.
I'm going with A and D. Selecting activity prices from other CO-versions and the combined run for standard and alternative valuations just make sense for actual costing.
Haha, reduced number of steps in the calculation cockpit? That's like saying I can get my taxes done faster by setting the house on fire. I'll go with B and D.
B and D seem like the correct answers. The simplified data structure and combined run for both standard and alternative valuations are definitely features of actual costing in S/4HANA.
Cheryl
5 months agoVenita
5 months agoVeronika
5 months agoMira
5 months agoGeraldo
6 months agoKiera
4 months agoStevie
5 months agoEdelmira
5 months agoEdelmira
5 months agoRodolfo
5 months agoRodolfo
5 months agoAdelaide
6 months agoTracie
5 months agoCharlie
5 months agoAntonio
6 months agoElfrieda
6 months agoBrande
6 months agoJanna
5 months agoMarge
5 months agoReed
5 months agoMaurine
5 months agoMalcolm
5 months agoGerri
5 months agoJanessa
5 months agoAlyce
6 months agoArlene
6 months agoCasey
6 months agoFreida
6 months agoElfrieda
6 months ago