A and D, all the way! Selecting activity prices from other versions and the combined run, that's the real deal. Though I'm not sure about the 'reduced number of steps' - maybe they just made the cockpit more confusing.
I'm going with A and D. Selecting activity prices from other CO-versions and the combined run for standard and alternative valuations just make sense for actual costing.
Haha, reduced number of steps in the calculation cockpit? That's like saying I can get my taxes done faster by setting the house on fire. I'll go with B and D.
B and D seem like the correct answers. The simplified data structure and combined run for both standard and alternative valuations are definitely features of actual costing in S/4HANA.
Cheryl
7 months agoVenita
6 months agoVeronika
7 months agoMira
7 months agoGeraldo
7 months agoKiera
6 months agoStevie
6 months agoEdelmira
6 months agoEdelmira
7 months agoRodolfo
7 months agoRodolfo
7 months agoAdelaide
8 months agoTracie
7 months agoCharlie
7 months agoAntonio
8 months agoElfrieda
8 months agoBrande
8 months agoJanna
6 months agoMarge
6 months agoReed
6 months agoMaurine
6 months agoMalcolm
7 months agoGerri
7 months agoJanessa
7 months agoAlyce
8 months agoArlene
8 months agoCasey
8 months agoFreida
8 months agoElfrieda
8 months ago