Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam P_S4FIN_2021 Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_S4FIN_2021 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 4
[All P_S4FIN_2021 Questions]

What setting must be identical between the company code and controlling area?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Stanton at Apr 29, 2024, 10:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium P_S4FIN_2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Cheryl
10 months ago
A and D, all the way! Selecting activity prices from other versions and the combined run, that's the real deal. Though I'm not sure about the 'reduced number of steps' - maybe they just made the cockpit more confusing.
upvoted 0 times
Venita
10 months ago
Maybe the reduced number of steps in the calculation cockpit is meant to streamline the process, not confuse it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
10 months ago
I think the simplified data structure with new table structure is also important for efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
10 months ago
I agree, A and D are definitely key features of actual costing in SAP S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geraldo
11 months ago
This is a piece of cake! B and D are the way to go. The new table structure and combined runs are where it's at for actual costing in S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
Kiera
9 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
10 months ago
The simplified data structure and combined run for valuations make actual costing in S/4HANA much more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
10 months ago
I agree, B and D are definitely key features of actual costing in SAP S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
10 months ago
Yes, the simplified data structure and combined run make actual costing in S/4HANA much more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
10 months ago
I agree, B and D are definitely the key features to look out for.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adelaide
11 months ago
I'm going with A and D. Selecting activity prices from other CO-versions and the combined run for standard and alternative valuations just make sense for actual costing.
upvoted 0 times
Tracie
10 months ago
Yes, it's great to have a simplified data structure and reduced steps in the calculation cockpit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
10 months ago
I agree, those features definitely streamline the actual costing process.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
11 months ago
Haha, reduced number of steps in the calculation cockpit? That's like saying I can get my taxes done faster by setting the house on fire. I'll go with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
11 months ago
Good point. Simplified data structure and reduced steps seem like the best fit. Let's go with those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
11 months ago
B and D seem like the correct answers. The simplified data structure and combined run for both standard and alternative valuations are definitely features of actual costing in S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
Janna
10 months ago
Thanks for the information, I learned something new today.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
10 months ago
No problem, happy to help!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
10 months ago
Oh, I see. Thanks for clarifying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
10 months ago
Actually, A and C are not part of the features of actual costing in SAP S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
10 months ago
I think A and C are also important features to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
10 months ago
Yes, you are right. The simplified data structure and combined run are key features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
10 months ago
B and D seem like the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
11 months ago
But isn't the combined run more about valuation options than actual costing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
11 months ago
I was thinking about the combined run option. It makes sense in terms of efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casey
11 months ago
Definitely! New table structure sounds correct to me. Maybe the reduced number of steps too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
11 months ago
Yeah, it's not straightforward. I think one answer might be the simplified data structure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
11 months ago
I find this question a bit tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel