Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam P_S4FIN_2021 Topic 3 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's P_S4FIN_2021 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 3
[All P_S4FIN_2021 Questions]

You want to set up a multi-level gross margin report in profitability analysis (CO-PA).What do you customize to report the fixed and variable values separately?Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Vincent at Feb 10, 2024, 08:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium P_S4FIN_2021 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lashon
1 years ago
That could work too, but creating a new variant might offer more flexibility in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
1 years ago
But wouldn't it be simpler to just change all company codes to the existing fiscal year variant K4?
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
1 years ago
I agree with Lashon. It would be best to assign the new variant to all company codes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
1 years ago
Option A is definitely the way to go! Creating a new fiscal year variant is the most flexible solution and will ensure everything is aligned during the conversion.
upvoted 0 times
Crissy
11 months ago
Thanks for the advice, I will go with option A for the conversion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
12 months ago
I agree, it's important to make sure everything is aligned properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 years ago
Option A is definitely the way to go! Creating a new fiscal year variant is the most flexible solution and will ensure everything is aligned during the conversion.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aretha
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'm leaning towards option B, since it seems the easiest solution to just change all the company codes to the controlling area's fiscal year variant.
upvoted 0 times
Carman
12 months ago
Changing all company codes and the controlling area to fiscal year variant K2 might be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
12 months ago
I think creating a new fiscal year variant and assigning it to all company codes could also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
1 years ago
Option B seems like the most straightforward choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
1 years ago
I think we need to create a new fiscal year variant for SAP S/4HANA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
1 years ago
I think changing to fiscal year variant K2 makes sense, it's simpler and more straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 years ago
That could work too, as long as we ensure everything is aligned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 years ago
This question seems tricky! I think option A is the correct answer, as creating a new fiscal year variant seems like the best way to handle the different variants in the company codes and controlling area.
upvoted 0 times
Chun
1 years ago
Yes, creating a new fiscal year variant and assigning it to all company codes and the controlling area would ensure consistency in the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 years ago
I agree, option A seems like the most logical solution to handle the different fiscal year variants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
1 years ago
Yes, creating a new variant will ensure consistency across all company codes and the controlling area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannie
1 years ago
I agree, option A seems like the most logical choice to standardize the fiscal year variant.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauryn
1 years ago
But wouldn't it be easier to just change all company codes to fiscal year variant K2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
1 years ago
I agree with Mirta, it makes sense to have a new fiscal year variant for consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 years ago
I think we need to create a new fiscal year variant for all company codes and controlling area.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel