BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_TS422_2023 Topic 10 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TS422_2023 exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 10
[All C_TS422_2023 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rozella
3 months ago
D all the way! Planning without final assembly is the way to go. That way, the company can adapt to changes in demand without disrupting the whole production process. This is some serious supply chain strategy stuff!
upvoted 0 times
Colette
2 months ago
True, but with planning without final assembly, the company can respond more quickly to changes in demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
But wouldn't planning with final assembly also provide some level of flexibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
3 months ago
I agree, planning without final assembly allows for more flexibility in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Silvana
4 months ago
That's true, but planning with final assembly allows for customization and flexibility in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm going to go with B. Planning with final assembly - it's the only one that sounds like it could handle the unexpected demand without messing up the production plan.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
2 months ago
Planning without final assembly (50) might not be the best choice if you want to avoid disruptions in the production program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
3 months ago
I think Make-to-stock production (10) would not be able to handle the unexpected demand without impacting the production program.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
3 months ago
Yeah, it's important to have a strategy in place to deal with situations where demand exceeds the forecasted quantity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
3 months ago
I agree with you! Planning with final assembly seems like the best option to handle unexpected demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glen
4 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I'm going with C. Make-to-stock production seems like the logical choice to ensure the product is available when customers order it.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
4 months ago
D is the correct answer. Planning without final assembly allows the company to adjust production without impacting the existing program. Make-to-stock is not the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
4 months ago
But with make-to-stock production, the finished goods are already produced and ready to be shipped when customers order them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Planning with final assembly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
4 months ago
I think the answer is B. Planning with final assembly seems to be the right strategy when the company expects the product to be in stock and needs to handle unexpected customer demand.
upvoted 0 times
Rodolfo
2 months ago
Actually, the correct answer is B. Planning with final assembly is the best strategy to handle unexpected customer demand without impacting production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carli
2 months ago
I think the answer is C. Make-to-stock production seems like a good strategy to ensure the product is always in stock.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
2 months ago
I agree, planning with final assembly allows for flexibility in handling unexpected customer demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lanie
2 months ago
I believe the correct answer is D. Planning without final assembly may not be the best choice when dealing with unexpected customer demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
3 months ago
I think the answer is C. Make-to-stock production also ensures the product is in stock when customers order it.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
3 months ago
I agree, planning with final assembly allows for flexibility in handling unexpected customer demand.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trina
4 months ago
I think the answer is A) Make-to-stock production.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel