Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_THR92_2405 Topic 5 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR92_2405 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 5
[All C_THR92_2405 Questions]

In the Advanced Reporting tool, you want to create a query that includes the employee's matrix manager. When you configure the table join with the Job Relationships table, the Results

tab displays multiple rows per employee that also include relationships to HR managers and second managers.

How do you configure the query to return one row per employee that shows the employee's matrix manager when assigned?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Eloisa
2 months ago
Wait, does this mean I have to join the Job Relationships table twice? That's going to make my query look like the tax code!
upvoted 0 times
Odette
7 days ago
That should help you get the desired result without joining the table twice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
11 days ago
B) Change the Job Relationship to include a table restriction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
12 days ago
No, you don't have to join the table twice. Just change the join type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
20 days ago
A) Change the Job Relationship join to a left join.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felicidad
2 months ago
You're right, an inner join would only return rows that have matching values in both tables. That makes more sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
2 months ago
An inner join? That's just going to give me the intersection of the two tables. I need all the employees, even if they don't have a matrix manager assigned.
upvoted 0 times
Lawrence
1 months ago
An inner join won't work for you. You need a left join to include all employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 months ago
B) Change the Job Relationship to include a table restriction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
1 months ago
A) Change the Job Relationship join to a left join.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dottie
2 months ago
But wouldn't a left join include all rows from the first table, even if there are no matches in the second table?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Change the Job Relationship join to an inner join.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 months ago
A right join? Really? That would just flip the tables and give me the managers first. I need the employees at the center of this query.
upvoted 0 times
Kristal
27 days ago
Got it, I'll try changing the join to a left join. Thanks for the clarification!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 months ago
A right join would not work in this case. You need the left join to keep the employees at the center.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 months ago
B) Change the Job Relationship to include a table restriction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
2 months ago
A) Change the Job Relationship join to a left join.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dottie
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) Change the Job Relationship join to a left join.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure a table restriction is the right approach here. Seems like that would just filter out the data I need.
upvoted 0 times
Oretha
2 months ago
D) Change the Job Relationship join to an inner join.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
2 months ago
I think changing it to a left join makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
2 months ago
B) Change the Job Relationship to include a table restriction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 months ago
A) Change the Job Relationship join to a left join.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
2 months ago
A left join sounds like the way to go. That should give me the employee data and the matrix manager, even if there are multiple relationships.
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
2 months ago
That's correct! A left join will return all rows from the left table (employee data) and the matching rows from the right table (matrix manager) even if there are multiple relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
2 months ago
Got it, thanks for the explanation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
2 months ago
A) Change the Job Relationship join to a left join.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel