Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_THR87_2405 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR87_2405 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All C_THR87_2405 Questions]

Which of the following can be achieved using variable pay gates? Notes: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Lorenza at Sep 17, 2024, 01:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR87_2405 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Karl
5 months ago
Option D is just silly. Tying EBITDA to Individual performance? That's a recipe for disaster! I'm sticking with B and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domingo
5 months ago
Haha, these variable pay gate questions always trip me up. I'm gonna go with A and C - gotta love those 'unless' clauses!
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
5 months ago
I'm going with B and D. The entire business goal section should payout at 50% if Customer Satisfaction is not met, and EBITDA should be 0% if Individual performance is not 'Good' or better. Aligns with best practices.
upvoted 0 times
Gracie
4 months ago
Definitely, having clear guidelines on payouts helps motivate employees to achieve targets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
4 months ago
Agreed, it's important to align variable pay gates with business goals and individual performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
5 months ago
I think B and D are the correct options too. It ensures fair payouts based on performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pauline
6 months ago
Hmm, you might be right. Let's review the options again to make sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D, as it specifies the condition for EBITDA goal payout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
6 months ago
Option C looks the most logical to me. The EBITDA goal should be capped at 100% if Revenue doesn't meet the target. That makes sense from a business perspective.
upvoted 0 times
Makeda
5 months ago
Option A is interesting too, with the combined payout of business goals exceeding 75%.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sena
5 months ago
I think option D is also important because it ties EBITDA payout to individual performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
5 months ago
I see your point. It's important to consider both individual performance and overall business goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
5 months ago
That's true, but I think option C provides a more balanced approach overall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
5 months ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
5 months ago
But what about option D? It also makes sense to tie EBITDA payout to individual performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
5 months ago
I agree, option C seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pauline
6 months ago
I think the answer is A, because it mentions the cap on the Individual section payout.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel