BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_THR86_2311 Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2311 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All C_THR86_2311 Questions]

Your client wishes to limit new employee salaries so that no employee can exceed 125% compa-ratio. They do not award lump sums. How can you configure the worksheet to meet this requirement?Note. There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Leota at Jan 24, 2024, 05:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2311 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Chau
6 months ago
Ah, the joys of HR policies. Maybe we can sneak in a little raise under the table, just for fun. Wink wink.
upvoted 0 times
Tresa
5 months ago
B) Create a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column compaRatio is less than 125
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
5 months ago
A) Create a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column curRatio is less than 125
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lajuana
6 months ago
Wait, what's a compa-ratio again? Guess I better brush up on my HR lingo before the exam.
upvoted 0 times
Ricarda
5 months ago
B) Create a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column compaRatio is less than 125
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
5 months ago
A) Create a custom validation of type Error to ensure that the column curRatio is less than 125
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loren
6 months ago
D is the way to go, folks. Disallow that exceeding and keep it under 125%. Simple as that!
upvoted 0 times
Margart
5 months ago
Agreed, D is the way to go. Let's keep those new employee salaries in check.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
5 months ago
D is definitely the correct choice. We need to disallow exceeding 125% compa-ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alaine
6 months ago
Option A sounds good to me! Gotta love those custom validations. Keeps those salaries in line, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
6 months ago
Hmm, looks like we need to watch out for those pesky compa-ratios. I'd go with option B and keep that compa-ratio in check.
upvoted 0 times
Joanna
5 months ago
Agreed, let's implement both options A and B to meet the client's requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
5 months ago
Sounds like a solid plan to me, covering all our bases with those validations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
5 months ago
Let's go with both options A and B to ensure no employee exceeds 125% compa-ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelia
5 months ago
True, having both options A and B would provide a double layer of protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
5 months ago
I think option A is a good backup to make sure all bases are covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
5 months ago
But wouldn't option A also work since it checks the curRatio column?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
6 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice to keep compa-ratios in check.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel