BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_THR86_2311 Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_THR86_2311 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All C_THR86_2311 Questions]

Your client wants to ensure that planners justify their decision to NOT give an employee a merit increase.What is the best way to accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Candida at Apr 12, 2024, 03:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_THR86_2311 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Gertude
5 months ago
I see your point, but I think adding a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'raise' under Define Standard Validation Rules is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
5 months ago
Option D? Really? Forcing a comment for a raise? That's just asking for trouble. Nobody likes paperwork for a good thing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
5 months ago
Option A is interesting, but I'm not sure custom validations are the best solution here. Seems a bit overkill.
upvoted 0 times
Caprice
5 months ago
Option C could also work by adding a comp-force-comment-config tag with mode attribute set to 'guideline'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
5 months ago
I agree, using a Force Comment Rule with mode set to 'no-raise' could help justify the decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
5 months ago
I think option B might be more appropriate in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Essie
6 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. Editing the XML? That sounds like a hassle. I'd go with the standard rule approach.
upvoted 0 times
Kati
5 months ago
B) Under Define Standard Validation Rules add a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'no-raise '
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
5 months ago
A) Use custom validations with the formula if(merit>0.'FALSE .'TRUE
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
5 months ago
B) Under Define Standard Validation Rules add a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'no-raise '
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
5 months ago
B) Under Define Standard Validation Rules add a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'no-raise '
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
5 months ago
A) Use custom validations with the formula if(merit>0.'FALSE .'TRUE
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
5 months ago
A) Use custom validations with the formula if(merit>0.'FALSE .'TRUE
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
6 months ago
I personally think editing the XML and adding a comp-force-comment-config tag with the mode attribute set to 'guideline' is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
6 months ago
Hmm, option B looks like the way to go. Forcing a comment for no-raise decisions seems logical.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
5 months ago
Yes, forcing a comment for no-raise decisions will ensure that planners provide justification for their decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isabelle
5 months ago
C) Edit the XML and add a comp-force-comment-config tag with the mode attribute set to 'guideline '
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
5 months ago
I think option D might be better to ensure a comment is given for raise decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
5 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
5 months ago
D) Under Define Standard Validation Rules add a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'raise '
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
5 months ago
That could work too, custom validations can provide more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elizabeth
6 months ago
A) Use custom validations with the formula if(merit>0.'FALSE .'TRUE
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharita
6 months ago
Hmm, option B looks like the way to go. Forcing a comment for no-raise decisions seems logical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
6 months ago
B) Under Define Standard Validation Rules add a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'no-raise '
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronald
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe adding a Force Comment Rule with the mode set to 'no-raise' is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
6 months ago
I think the best way to ensure planners justify their decision is to use custom validations with the formula if(merit>0, 'FALSE', 'TRUE')
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
7 months ago
I don't know, man. I kind of like the XML editing option. It feels a little more elegant, you know? Plus, it gives us a bit more control over the process. But I can see the appeal of the 'no-raise' option too. It's a tough call, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
7 months ago
Haha, you guys are really overthinking this, aren't you? I say we just go with the 'no-raise' option and call it a day. That way, the planner has to explain themselves, and we don't have to worry about any fancy XML editing or custom validations. Keep it simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
7 months ago
You know, I was actually thinking about the 'raise' option under the Force Comment Rule. I mean, if the mode is set to 'raise', then the planner has to explain why they're giving the raise, which is kind of the opposite of what we're going for here. But I guess it could work if we're just trying to get them to document their decisions, regardless of the outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
7 months ago
Hmm, I don't know, guys. I was thinking that we could edit the XML and add a comp-force-comment-config tag with the mode attribute set to 'guideline'. That way, it's like a gentle nudge for the planner to explain their decision, rather than a hard-line requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
7 months ago
I'm not so sure about that, dude. I think the better way to go is to add a Force Comment Rule under Define Standard Validation Rules, with the mode set to 'no-raise'. That way, the planner has to leave a comment explaining why they're not giving the raise, and it's a bit more user-friendly than the custom validation thing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
7 months ago
This question is pretty straightforward, but it's also a bit tricky. We need to make sure that the planners justify their decision not to give an employee a merit increase, right? I think the best way to do that is to use a custom validation with the formula if(merit>0,'FALSE','TRUE). That way, the planner has to explicitly say why they're not giving the merit increase.
upvoted 0 times
Matilda
5 months ago
I prefer option C. Editing the XML seems like a more direct approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
5 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to use option B? It adds a Force Comment Rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
6 months ago
I think option A makes sense. It forces the planner to explain their decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel