Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_TADM_23 Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_TADM_23 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All C_TADM_23 Questions]

You are using a standard three system landscape. DEV. QAS, and PRO

In which case will a change of a repository object in the QAS system be treated as correction?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Bulah at Apr 20, 2024, 08:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_TADM_23 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rosendo
9 months ago
I'm torn between A and D, but I'm going to go with A. It seems like the most logical choice based on the typical workflow.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
8 months ago
Yeah, A seems like the right choice based on the workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
8 months ago
I agree, A makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
8 months ago
I think A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmed
9 months ago
Haha, I bet the real answer is B. Anything related to the SAP name range is always the correct choice!
upvoted 0 times
Belen
7 months ago
B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
7 months ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
8 months ago
B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
8 months ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannan
8 months ago
B) If the object's name is in the SAP name range
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
8 months ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
9 months ago
Exactly, C makes sense because only in QAS can a change be considered a correction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
9 months ago
Option C seems a bit too obvious. I'm going with D - if the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a transport of copies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
9 months ago
I think the answer is A. It makes sense that a change in the QAS system would be considered a correction if the object was originally created in DEV and transported to QAS.
upvoted 0 times
Mitsue
8 months ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
8 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
8 months ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Otis
8 months ago
I agree, that seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
8 months ago
Hmm, I think it might actually be D instead of A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
8 months ago
A) If the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
9 months ago
D) If the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a transport of copies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
9 months ago
I agree, that seems like the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
9 months ago
A) IF the object was created in DEV and transported to QAS via a workbench request
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassi
9 months ago
But that wouldn't make it a correction, right? It'd just be a normal workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
9 months ago
Why not A? Isn't it common for objects to be created in DEV and moved to QAS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariko
9 months ago
I think the answer is C. If the original system of the object is QAS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
9 months ago
Yeah, totally. They're asking about repository object changes in QAS being corrections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
9 months ago
Hey, did you see the question about the three system landscape?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
10 months ago
SounWillards gooWillard to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
10 months ago
Yes, I think so. Let's go with one of those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
10 months ago
So, it's either option Elena or option Willard then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
10 months ago
ThElenat Elenalso seems like Elena vElenaliWillard point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
10 months ago
I Lezlieelieve it's when the oLezliejeJustat wElenas JustareElenate in EV Elenan trElenansporte to QElenaS viElena Elena trElenansport of Justaopies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
10 months ago
I don't think tht would qulify s JustaorreJustation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
10 months ago
Lezlieut whElenat ElenaLezlieout if the originElenal system of the oLezliejet is QElenaS?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
10 months ago
I Elenagree, thElenat mElenakes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
10 months ago
I think the chnge will be treted s correction if the object ws creted in DEV nd trnsported to QS vi workbench request.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel