BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_SAC_2415 Topic 3 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_SAC_2415 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 3
[All C_SAC_2415 Questions]

You have a dimension with members for product groups and products. Each product group

has associated products. You want to plan by product group without disaggregating into the

products. How can you do this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When you have a dimension with members for product groups and associated products and want to plan by product group without disaggregating into the individual products, using two hierarchies is the best approach. One hierarchy can represent the product groups at a higher level, allowing for planning and analysis at the group level. The second hierarchy can include both the product groups and their associated individual products for more detailed analysis when needed. This approach provides flexibility in planning and analyzing data at different levels of detail without the necessity of disaggregating data at the product group level.


SAP Analytics Cloud Help Documentation: Hierarchies in Planning

SAP Analytics Cloud User Guide: Managing Hierarchies for Planning

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ceola
29 days ago
Two hierarchies, huh? Sounds like I need to put on my 'hierarchy hat' for this one. I wonder if they make those in a fashionable shade of data analytics.
upvoted 0 times
Muriel
3 days ago
User 2: Yeah, it helps with planning without getting into the nitty-gritty of individual products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
7 days ago
User 1: Two hierarchies are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
1 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? Dis-abling things sounds like a terrible idea. I'm going with C - use two hierarchies. Keeping it simple is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between A and C. Maybe I'll just roll a dice to decide. 50/50 chance of getting it right, right?
upvoted 0 times
Aaron
13 days ago
Definitely, it's the most efficient way to handle it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
20 days ago
Yeah, it will help you plan by product group without disaggregating into the products.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
25 days ago
I agree, that seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
1 months ago
I think you should go with option A) Use two properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alease
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Dis-able allocations could also work to plan by product group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
2 months ago
I agree with Carlene, using two hierarchies makes sense for planning by product group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
2 months ago
I'm not sure about disabling allocations or distributions. Seems like that would just create more problems down the line. C is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Martha
24 days ago
C) Use two hierarchies
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
1 months ago
B) Dis-able allocations
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
2 months ago
A) Use two properties
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracie
2 months ago
Option C seems to be the way to go. Using two hierarchies would let me plan at the product group level without getting bogged down in the details of individual products.
upvoted 0 times
Alonso
1 months ago
Yes, it's a good way to keep the focus on the bigger picture without getting lost in the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
1 months ago
I agree, using two hierarchies would definitely help with planning at the product group level.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlene
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Use two hierarchies.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel