I reckon the 3-month and 1-year periods are the ones they're looking for. Those seem to be the standard timeframes used in portfolio management, from what I know.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I mean, 10 days might be useful for, like, tracking daily market fluctuations or something. But for actual financial planning, yeah, 3 months and 1 year seem like the better options.
You know, if I was the one who wrote this question, I'd have thrown in something like '6 months' just to mess with people. But yeah, 3 months and 1 year sound about right to me.
Personally, I think the 3-month and 1-year options are the way to go. Financial planning requires a bit more long-term thinking than just a couple of weeks or days.
I agree, the shorter time frames don't seem appropriate for portfolio management. If I had to guess, I'd say 3 months and 1 year are the valid answers here.
Hmm, I'm not sure about this question. 10 days and 2 weeks seem a bit too short for proper financial planning, don't you think? I'd go with the longer periods, like 3 months and 1 year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Truman
5 months agoTammara
4 months agoLeatha
4 months agoKanisha
4 months agoJosefa
4 months agoTalia
5 months agoElin
5 months agoTracey
5 months agoLeonor
5 months agoCheryl
5 months agoMargret
4 months agoFrancine
5 months agoFelicidad
5 months agoHaley
5 months agoBo
6 months agoChristiane
6 months agoTresa
5 months agoDaniel
5 months agoAshton
6 months agoStephane
6 months agoStaci
6 months agoBo
6 months agoStephane
6 months agoMeaghan
7 months agoJospeh
6 months agoDominic
6 months agoYoulanda
7 months agoAntione
7 months agoCarissa
7 months agoQuentin
7 months agoRoosevelt
7 months ago