I reckon the 3-month and 1-year periods are the ones they're looking for. Those seem to be the standard timeframes used in portfolio management, from what I know.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I mean, 10 days might be useful for, like, tracking daily market fluctuations or something. But for actual financial planning, yeah, 3 months and 1 year seem like the better options.
You know, if I was the one who wrote this question, I'd have thrown in something like '6 months' just to mess with people. But yeah, 3 months and 1 year sound about right to me.
Personally, I think the 3-month and 1-year options are the way to go. Financial planning requires a bit more long-term thinking than just a couple of weeks or days.
I agree, the shorter time frames don't seem appropriate for portfolio management. If I had to guess, I'd say 3 months and 1 year are the valid answers here.
Hmm, I'm not sure about this question. 10 days and 2 weeks seem a bit too short for proper financial planning, don't you think? I'd go with the longer periods, like 3 months and 1 year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Truman
7 months agoTammara
6 months agoLeatha
6 months agoKanisha
6 months agoJosefa
6 months agoTalia
7 months agoElin
6 months agoTracey
6 months agoLeonor
6 months agoCheryl
7 months agoMargret
6 months agoFrancine
6 months agoFelicidad
6 months agoHaley
7 months agoBo
7 months agoChristiane
7 months agoTresa
6 months agoDaniel
7 months agoAshton
7 months agoStephane
8 months agoStaci
8 months agoBo
8 months agoStephane
8 months agoMeaghan
9 months agoJospeh
8 months agoDominic
8 months agoYoulanda
9 months agoAntione
9 months agoCarissa
9 months agoQuentin
9 months agoRoosevelt
9 months ago