I reckon the 3-month and 1-year periods are the ones they're looking for. Those seem to be the standard timeframes used in portfolio management, from what I know.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I mean, 10 days might be useful for, like, tracking daily market fluctuations or something. But for actual financial planning, yeah, 3 months and 1 year seem like the better options.
You know, if I was the one who wrote this question, I'd have thrown in something like '6 months' just to mess with people. But yeah, 3 months and 1 year sound about right to me.
Personally, I think the 3-month and 1-year options are the way to go. Financial planning requires a bit more long-term thinking than just a couple of weeks or days.
I agree, the shorter time frames don't seem appropriate for portfolio management. If I had to guess, I'd say 3 months and 1 year are the valid answers here.
Hmm, I'm not sure about this question. 10 days and 2 weeks seem a bit too short for proper financial planning, don't you think? I'd go with the longer periods, like 3 months and 1 year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Truman
8 months agoTammara
7 months agoLeatha
7 months agoKanisha
7 months agoJosefa
8 months agoTalia
8 months agoElin
8 months agoTracey
8 months agoLeonor
8 months agoCheryl
8 months agoMargret
8 months agoFrancine
8 months agoFelicidad
8 months agoHaley
8 months agoBo
9 months agoChristiane
9 months agoTresa
8 months agoDaniel
8 months agoAshton
9 months agoStephane
9 months agoStaci
9 months agoBo
9 months agoStephane
9 months agoMeaghan
10 months agoJospeh
9 months agoDominic
9 months agoYoulanda
10 months agoAntione
10 months agoCarissa
10 months agoQuentin
10 months agoRoosevelt
10 months ago