Which of the following System Landscape Transformation (SLT) staging tables should be populated to connect third-party legacy systems to the Central Finance system? Note: There are 3 correct answers to this question.
Haha, this question is like a treasure hunt! I'm going to guess A, B, and D just to keep things interesting. Maybe the header table is the hidden gem here.
This is a tricky one! I'm going with B, C, and D. The product tax items table could be useful for connecting financial data, even though it's not directly mentioned in the question.
I agree with Christiane, B, D, and E seem to be the right choices here. The customer line items table is a bit of a wildcard, but it could be used to connect customer data from the legacy systems.
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I think A, B, and D are the correct answers. The header table would be needed to connect the systems, and the debit/credit and cost object items are also important.
I agree with you, A, B, and D are the correct answers. Those tables are essential for connecting third-party legacy systems to the Central Finance system.
I think B, D, and E are the correct answers. The question specifically mentions connecting third-party legacy systems to the Central Finance system, so the debit and credit items, cost object items, and customer line items tables would be the relevant ones.
Actually, the correct answers are B, D, and E. Debit and credit items, cost object items, and customer line items tables are the ones needed for connecting third-party legacy systems to the Central Finance system.
Gail
4 months agoWenona
3 months agoAlise
3 months agoNaomi
3 months agoKristel
4 months agoEmogene
5 months agoTish
3 months agoTish
4 months agoJoesph
5 months agoLonny
5 months agoShawna
4 months agoShawna
4 months agoMable
5 months agoMagdalene
5 months agoChristiane
5 months agoIlene
4 months agoIlene
4 months agoIlene
5 months agoLynna
5 months ago