BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

SAP Exam C_PO_7521 Topic 6 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_PO_7521 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 6
[All C_PO_7521 Questions]

You create an asynchronous scenario. The message sequence must remain identical. Which Quality of Service must you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Catarina
5 months ago
Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the answer, no question about it. Unless you want your messages to be 'exactly once in disorder'!
upvoted 0 times
Paulene
5 months ago
Definitely, it's important to maintain message sequence in asynchronous scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
5 months ago
I agree, using EOIO ensures that messages are processed in the order they were sent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
5 months ago
Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the answer, no question about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chan
5 months ago
I feel like Best Effort (BE) could also work, but it might not guarantee the message sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graham
5 months ago
I agree with Moira, using EOIO will ensure the message sequence remains identical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
6 months ago
qRFC? More like 'Que? RFC?' I'm sticking with Exactly Once in Order for this one, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Albert
4 months ago
Yeah, that sounds like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
4 months ago
I think I'll go with Exactly Once in Order too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
5 months ago
Yeah, qRFC sounds confusing. I'll go with Exactly Once in Order too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
5 months ago
I agree, Exactly Once in Order is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcom
6 months ago
Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the way to keep those messages in line, just like my socks after laundry day.
upvoted 0 times
Tamesha
5 months ago
I agree, EOIO ensures that messages are processed in the correct order.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
5 months ago
Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the way to keep those messages in line, just like my socks after laundry day.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justa
6 months ago
Best Effort (BE)? More like 'Best of Luck' if you ask me. I'm going with Exactly Once in Order all the way!
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
5 months ago
Best Effort? Good luck with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
5 months ago
Exactly Once in Order
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Moira
6 months ago
I think we should use Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
6 months ago
C'mon, Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the only way to go! We don't want any message sequence shenanigans, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
4 months ago
Let's stick with Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this asynchronous scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
5 months ago
qRFC is not the best option for maintaining message sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
5 months ago
Exactly Once (EO) might work, but EOIO is the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
5 months ago
Best Effort (BE) just won't cut it for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
5 months ago
Agreed, we need to make sure the message sequence is maintained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
5 months ago
Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is definitely the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
6 months ago
I feel like Best Effort (BE) could also work, but it might not guarantee the message sequence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
6 months ago
I agree with using EOIO will ensure the message sequence remains identical.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paul
6 months ago
I think we should use Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel