SAP Exam C_PO_7521 Topic 6 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_PO_7521 exam

Question #: 40
Topic #: 6

[All C_PO_7521 Questions]

You create an asynchronous scenario. The message sequence must remain identical. Which Quality of Service must you use?

ABest Effort (BE)

BExactly Once (EO)

CExactly Once in Order (EOIO)

DqRFC

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Jutta at Mar 21, 2024, 12:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_PO_7521 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Catarina

8 months ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the answer, no question about it. Unless you want your messages to be 'exactly once in disorder'!

upvoted 0 times

Paulene

8 months ago

Definitely, it's important to maintain message sequence in asynchronous scenarios.

upvoted 0 times

...

Krissy

8 months ago

I agree, using EOIO ensures that messages are processed in the order they were sent.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billye

8 months ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the answer, no question about it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chan

9 months ago

I feel like Best Effort (BE) could also work, but it might not guarantee the message sequence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Graham

9 months ago

I agree with Moira, using EOIO will ensure the message sequence remains identical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tatum

9 months ago

qRFC? More like 'Que? RFC?' I'm sticking with Exactly Once in Order for this one, folks.

upvoted 0 times

Albert

7 months ago

Yeah, that sounds like the best option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

7 months ago

I think I'll go with Exactly Once in Order too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Una

8 months ago

Yeah, qRFC sounds confusing. I'll go with Exactly Once in Order too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammi

8 months ago

I agree, Exactly Once in Order is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

9 months ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the way to keep those messages in line, just like my socks after laundry day.

upvoted 0 times

Tamesha

8 months ago

I agree, EOIO ensures that messages are processed in the correct order.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheline

8 months ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the way to keep those messages in line, just like my socks after laundry day.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justa

9 months ago

Best Effort (BE)? More like 'Best of Luck' if you ask me. I'm going with Exactly Once in Order all the way!

upvoted 0 times

Jerry

9 months ago

Best Effort? Good luck with that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

9 months ago

Exactly Once in Order

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

9 months ago

I think we should use Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

9 months ago

C'mon, Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is the only way to go! We don't want any message sequence shenanigans, you know?

upvoted 0 times

Kimbery

8 months ago

Let's stick with Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this asynchronous scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donte

8 months ago

qRFC is not the best option for maintaining message sequence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrinne

8 months ago

Exactly Once (EO) might work, but EOIO is the safer choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

8 months ago

Best Effort (BE) just won't cut it for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwenn

8 months ago

Agreed, we need to make sure the message sequence is maintained.

upvoted 0 times

...

Millie

8 months ago

Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) is definitely the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephaine

9 months ago

I feel like Best Effort (BE) could also work, but it might not guarantee the message sequence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

9 months ago

I agree with using EOIO will ensure the message sequence remains identical.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paul

9 months ago

I think we should use Exactly Once in Order (EOIO) for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...