Haha, Jesusa's got a point there. If the hiring date was an option, I'd be double-checking my work. Sounds like something a trickster of an exam writer would throw in there just to see who's paying attention.
Wait, the hiring date? Really? I thought that was a trick question. What kind of payroll system uses the hiring date to limit retroactive accounting? That's just plain weird.
Oh, come on! This is too easy. Of course, B, C, and E are the right answers. Who doesn't know that the hiring date (D) wouldn't limit the retroactive accounting depth? That's just silly.
I agree with Stanford. And the 'Earliest retroactive accounting period' in the Payroll control record sounds like it would also be a factor. This is a tricky one, but I think we've got it covered.
Hmm, I think B, C, and E are the correct answers. The start date of the current data record for Basic Pay (infotype 8) and the 'Earliest personal retroactive accounting date' in the Payroll Status infotype (0003) would definitely limit the retroactive accounting depth.
Emerson
2 months agoJesusa
2 months agoIzetta
10 days agoIn
18 days agoIsidra
21 days agoDanilo
1 months agoBilly
2 months agoShayne
26 days agoKenda
1 months agoZona
2 months agoMarge
2 months agoMarguerita
1 months agoJohnetta
2 months agoLilli
2 months agoGlory
2 months agoKimberlie
2 months agoStanford
3 months agoJustine
1 months agoJustine
2 months agoJustine
2 months agoDalene
3 months ago