Haha, Jesusa's got a point there. If the hiring date was an option, I'd be double-checking my work. Sounds like something a trickster of an exam writer would throw in there just to see who's paying attention.
Wait, the hiring date? Really? I thought that was a trick question. What kind of payroll system uses the hiring date to limit retroactive accounting? That's just plain weird.
Oh, come on! This is too easy. Of course, B, C, and E are the right answers. Who doesn't know that the hiring date (D) wouldn't limit the retroactive accounting depth? That's just silly.
I agree with Stanford. And the 'Earliest retroactive accounting period' in the Payroll control record sounds like it would also be a factor. This is a tricky one, but I think we've got it covered.
Hmm, I think B, C, and E are the correct answers. The start date of the current data record for Basic Pay (infotype 8) and the 'Earliest personal retroactive accounting date' in the Payroll Status infotype (0003) would definitely limit the retroactive accounting depth.
Emerson
19 days agoJesusa
21 days agoDanilo
10 days agoBilly
27 days agoKenda
8 days agoZona
15 days agoMarge
1 months agoMarguerita
11 days agoJohnetta
20 days agoLilli
24 days agoGlory
1 months agoKimberlie
1 months agoStanford
2 months agoJustine
14 days agoJustine
20 days agoJustine
1 months agoDalene
2 months ago