SAP Exam C_HCMOD_05 Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HCMOD_05 exam

Question #: 13
Topic #: 3

You combine two customer master data tables with a union node in a calculation view. Both master data tables include the same customer name.How do you ensure that each customer name appears only once in the results?

ADefine a restricted column in a union node.

BIn the union node, map both source customer name columns to one target column.

CAdd an intersect node above the union node.

DInclude an aggregation node above the union node.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Fabiola at Mar 16, 2024, 09:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_HCMOD_05 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Celeste

10 months ago

That's a good point, Christa. It can help provide time intervals for time-dependent parent-child hierarchies as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christa

10 months ago

I believe it can also store historical versions of attributes, which can be useful for analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Geraldine

10 months ago

I agree with Celeste. It can also add a temporal condition to a join to find matching records based on a date.

upvoted 0 times

...

Celeste

10 months ago

I think creating calculation views with type TIME can help provide additional time-related navigation possibilities.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ranee

10 months ago

Option A is the way to go. Who doesn't love more time-related navigation? It's like a time-traveling superpower!

upvoted 0 times

Billye

10 months ago

I never thought about it that way, but it does sound like a time-traveling superpower!

upvoted 0 times

...

Elin

10 months ago

I agree, having more time-related navigation possibilities is always helpful.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacklyn

10 months ago

Option A is definitely the best choice!

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuki

10 months ago

B seems like the obvious choice here. Gotta have that date-based join functionality.

upvoted 0 times

Barney

9 months ago

Yeah, B is essential for finding matching records based on dates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gaynell

10 months ago

I agree, B is the best option for adding temporal conditions to joins.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caren

10 months ago

Yeah, B is essential for finding matching records based on dates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacklyn

10 months ago

I agree, B is definitely the right choice for adding temporal conditions to joins.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nettie

11 months ago

I believe option D could also be a valid reason. Providing time intervals for time-dependent hierarchies is important in data modeling.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

11 months ago

C looks interesting. Storing historical versions of attributes could come in handy.

upvoted 0 times

Troy

10 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

10 months ago

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

11 months ago

I'd go with D. Those time-dependent hierarchies can be a real headache without the right tools.

upvoted 0 times

Ariel

10 months ago

A) To provide additional time-related navigation possibilities

upvoted 0 times

...

Ariel

11 months ago

D) To provide the time intervals required by time-dependent parent-child hierarchies

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenelle

11 months ago

I agree, option A seems like the most logical choice for creating calculation views of data category DIMENSION with type TIME.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronna

11 months ago

Option A sounds good to me. More time-related navigation options? Sign me up!

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

11 months ago

I think option A is correct. It allows for more ways to navigate time-related data.

upvoted 0 times

...