BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP Exam C_HCMOD_05 Topic 3 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_HCMOD_05 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 3
[All C_HCMOD_05 Questions]

Why would you create calculation views of data category DIMENSION with type TIME?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Fabiola at Mar 16, 2024, 09:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_HCMOD_05 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Celeste
5 months ago
That's a good point, Christa. It can help provide time intervals for time-dependent parent-child hierarchies as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christa
5 months ago
I believe it can also store historical versions of attributes, which can be useful for analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
5 months ago
I agree with Celeste. It can also add a temporal condition to a join to find matching records based on a date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
5 months ago
I think creating calculation views with type TIME can help provide additional time-related navigation possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
5 months ago
Option A is the way to go. Who doesn't love more time-related navigation? It's like a time-traveling superpower!
upvoted 0 times
Billye
5 months ago
I never thought about it that way, but it does sound like a time-traveling superpower!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
5 months ago
I agree, having more time-related navigation possibilities is always helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
5 months ago
Option A is definitely the best choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuki
6 months ago
B seems like the obvious choice here. Gotta have that date-based join functionality.
upvoted 0 times
Barney
5 months ago
Yeah, B is essential for finding matching records based on dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
5 months ago
I agree, B is the best option for adding temporal conditions to joins.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
5 months ago
Yeah, B is essential for finding matching records based on dates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacklyn
5 months ago
I agree, B is definitely the right choice for adding temporal conditions to joins.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nettie
6 months ago
I believe option D could also be a valid reason. Providing time intervals for time-dependent hierarchies is important in data modeling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
6 months ago
C looks interesting. Storing historical versions of attributes could come in handy.
upvoted 0 times
Troy
5 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
5 months ago
C
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristofer
6 months ago
I'd go with D. Those time-dependent hierarchies can be a real headache without the right tools.
upvoted 0 times
Ariel
5 months ago
A) To provide additional time-related navigation possibilities
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
6 months ago
D) To provide the time intervals required by time-dependent parent-child hierarchies
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jenelle
6 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the most logical choice for creating calculation views of data category DIMENSION with type TIME.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
6 months ago
Option A sounds good to me. More time-related navigation options? Sign me up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
6 months ago
I think option A is correct. It allows for more ways to navigate time-related data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel